Note that this article is from 2007 about a book published in 2000. I think it’s safe to say that whatever Putnam observed in the 90s is largely irrelevant today.
Edit: it may actually be referring to a study published in 2007. I can’t tell because the article doesn’t link the study.
The article itself was from 2007, per the copyright notice. I was really confused by all of the time elements until that came into specific relief. The data are from 2000, meaning before 9/11, so I’m not seeing much utility for how this pertains to life 25 years later.
What has me confused is it seems to be referring to some “new study” but doesn’t cite it, and I can’t find that study online.
Even if the study existed, and even if it were somehow accurate, that would have been 18 years ago and wholly irrelevant today. And those are big "if"s.
I don’t really know what the post is trying to discuss. Unfortunately, the poster seems to be completely silent on the subject beyond posting the link to the article.
Note that this article is from 2007 about a book published in 2000. I think it’s safe to say that whatever Putnam observed in the 90s is largely irrelevant today.
Edit: it may actually be referring to a study published in 2007. I can’t tell because the article doesn’t link the study.
The article itself was from 2007, per the copyright notice. I was really confused by all of the time elements until that came into specific relief. The data are from 2000, meaning before 9/11, so I’m not seeing much utility for how this pertains to life 25 years later.
What has me confused is it seems to be referring to some “new study” but doesn’t cite it, and I can’t find that study online.
Even if the study existed, and even if it were somehow accurate, that would have been 18 years ago and wholly irrelevant today. And those are big "if"s.
I don’t really know what the post is trying to discuss. Unfortunately, the poster seems to be completely silent on the subject beyond posting the link to the article.