•  Altair   ( @OtakuAltair@vlemmy.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Key difference is that they’re making (alot of) money of off the stolen work, and in a way that’s only possible for the already filthy rich

      Wouldn’t mind it personally if it was foss though, like their name suggests

      • FWIW even if it was FOSS I’d still care. For me it’s more about intent. If your business model/livelihood relies on stealing from people there’s a problem. That’s as true on a business level as it is an individual one.

        Doesn’t mean I have an answer as sometimes it’s extremely complex. The easy analogy is how we pirate TV shows and movies. Netflix originally proved this could be mitigated by providing the material cheaply and easily. People don’t want to steal (on average).

    •  pipows   ( @pipows@lemmy.pt ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      They’re using people’s content without authorization, but for a open information ideology or something like that, they are closed source and they are using it to make money. I don’t think that should be illegal, but it is certainly a dick move