Since status-quo bias can be beneficial in some contexts, the researchers do not advocate purging it from LLMs. Instead, (…) individuals who use LLMs for advice should be aware of this bias, and engineer their prompts accordingly.
It sounds like they’re saying “you’re holding it wrong”.
What about NOT asking LLMs for advices, and relying on advices from professionals or experts on the topic?
What about NOT asking LLMs for advices, and relying on advices from professionals or experts on the topic?
I mean that would be ideal, but IMO this article about another risk of using LLMs is still pretty useful. We need to understand what we are dealing with without shying away.
Its same way how HIV initial response failed because everyone just shamed HIV gay and “you shouldn’t have gay promiscuous sex anyway” instead of research.
Same way we shouldn’t shame use of LLMs, and intead try to understand what its doing to brains and society and spread awareness.
It sounds like they’re saying “you’re holding it wrong”.
What about NOT asking LLMs for advices, and relying on advices from professionals or experts on the topic?
I mean that would be ideal, but IMO this article about another risk of using LLMs is still pretty useful. We need to understand what we are dealing with without shying away.
Its same way how HIV initial response failed because everyone just shamed HIV gay and “you shouldn’t have gay promiscuous sex anyway” instead of research.
Same way we shouldn’t shame use of LLMs, and intead try to understand what its doing to brains and society and spread awareness.