• Sorry, I deleted my comment because I realized that I misread the post I was replying to.

    To respond to this post, yes, that is problematic if you care about the workability of the system, but if you have morals, then weather or not the system works is moot.

    • And, again, morals don’t enter into it. People deserve to be paid for the work that they do, and it doesn’t matter what that work is.

      Isn’t that what the whole “anti-work” is about? Paying people what they deserve to be paid, right? Why do you think people involved in food production or distribution deserve any less? They work as hard, or harder, than you or I do. Nobody should expect them to work for free “because food should be a right, man!”

      •  deaf_fish   ( @deaf_fish@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ok, but why do people deserve to get paid for their work? That seems like a moralist statement. Is there deeper rational supporting that statement, or is that a moral imperative for you?

        Edit: to be clear I’m not disagreeing with the premise, I just want your reasoning for arriving at it.

        • Super simple. My time is valuable to me, if you ask me to contribute my time for something that benefits you, I need to be compensated for my time.

          I can choose to donate my time, but doing so comes at a cost to me and if I contribute too much of my time, then I can’t pay bills, my electricity gets turned off, I get evicted, and so on.

          Do you value yourself so little that you work for free? If so, I’ve got some housework you can do!