We live in an age when the most unobjectionable and necessary ideas for progress can give rise to paranoia and fear. If the most innocuous, unoriginal possible idea can fuel paranoia, how can we hope to have a sensible discussion about the future of our places?
As i understand it, the objections are because in some articles they are afraid you won’t be able to move out of your 15m radius. 1st it’s a concept and then they are pushing for you to stay in your 15m neighborhood or you are criticized and in time you’re just not allow to leave if there’s an epidemic and stuff like that
Not saying I agree, just trying to explain the reasoning