Failed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party maegul (he/they) ( @maegul@lemmy.ml ) TechnologyEnglish • 2 years ago message-square66fedilinkarrow-up1208
arrow-up1208external-linkFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.org maegul (he/they) ( @maegul@lemmy.ml ) TechnologyEnglish • 2 years ago message-square66fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-square outofemailaliases ( @outofemailaliases@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) linkfedilink7•2 years agobut if it were real, they were claiming it could be manufactured easily, so making some samples to send out to research labs would not be too difficult
minus-square TonyTonyChopper ( @TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz ) linkfedilink4•2 years agoRight. And they haven’t. Now what may we deduce about their confidence in these results?
but if it were real, they were claiming it could be manufactured easily, so making some samples to send out to research labs would not be too difficult
Right. And they haven’t. Now what may we deduce about their confidence in these results?