For me, snaps are unnecessarily complex for desktop and frequently upgraded user applications. For server services, I can deal with them okay. For desktop applications, I much prefer flatpack or appimage if the application isn’t available in distro package managers. Mostly I run arch derivatives though.
Is there any particular reason you use flatpaks rather than snaps? (Not that I’m suggesting using snaps, I myself prefer flatpak, just curious)
I said ubuntu but I’m actually mostly running pop-os and the pop shop installed them as flatpak. I’ve been switching between the two alot lately.
Ah alright, that makes more sense. I ran Pop-OS for a while, and a few other distros since then, but keep coming back to Fedora
For me, snaps are unnecessarily complex for desktop and frequently upgraded user applications. For server services, I can deal with them okay. For desktop applications, I much prefer flatpack or appimage if the application isn’t available in distro package managers. Mostly I run arch derivatives though.