WHO warned that the reported number of cases and deaths do not reflect the true numbers. Read more at straitstimes.com.

    • You can’t even defend your side of the debate. I’m asking you to explain the simplest logistics of what you suggest, and you won’t even try. When will you understand that means your argument is wrong?

      • This isn’t a debate.

        This is you being an asshole and trying to justify the mass death that resulted from the global covid response as impossible to avoid when it was very possible to avoid.

        You should be less worried about replying to me and more worried about earning your Shut The Fuck Up degree.
        You got a D- on your last assignment, recall?

        • Sure, because you refuse to engage.

          I gave you reasons why a 2 week hard lockdown wouldn’t have worked to solve covid. You gave a new scenario where we needed a longer lockdown and rigorous testing. I pointed out flaws in that plan, and you then started insulting me instead of actually addressing those flaws.

          Why won’t you answer the logistics questions of how your plan to lockdown the whole world and test every person and animal on it at gunpoint would work?

            • I’m not murderous, I masked, locked down, got vaccinated as soon as I could.

              But there are absolutely no measures we could have taken that would have eliminated covid. We could only slow it down.

              You need to learn about epidemiology, as well as logistics, because your suggestions of how we “could” have dealt with it would not work and I’m trying to get you to understand why.

              And I have my degree, you can call me Doctor by the way.