• We used to have that back in the day with Siskel and Ebert. Two, classically trained film reviewers, who had a show that aired the week before the films they were reviewing were due to come out.

    Of the two, Ebert would go easier on pure entertainment movies than Siskel would. They didn’t always agree, but when they did, you could be assured it was either really good or really bad.

    We don’t really have an equivalent in this day and age with review embargoes and such.

    • While S & E were great for explaining why they liked or did not like movies, their opinions were still opinions and at best they gave middling reviews to the types of movies they did not like even when those movies were the best of their type.

      Plus Ebert gave Anaconda a high rating and praise. Fucking Anaconda.

      • He liked Spawn as well which I still have not entirely forgiven him for! But like I say, of the two, he was the one who went easier on populist media than Siskel did. That’s probably why putting the two of them together worked better than anyone else who inherited the shows they left as they bounced around from one to the next to the next.

        Who else had their platform before Siskel died? Rex Reed + somebody else was one, and I think there was one more pair as well.

        Rex Reed sticks out because he turned into a giant bitchy queen when he really hated a movie and it was hilarious.

    •  SeaJ   ( @SeaJ@lemm.ee ) 
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I give props to Ebert for putting his money where his mouth is and actually writing a movie. While not a great movie, he was still willing to go through the process of writing a screenplay and getting the movie made.