For my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.comexternal-link JoYo ( @JoYo@lemmy.ml ) Fediverse@lemmy.ml • 1 year ago message-square20fedilinkarrow-up19
arrow-up19external-linkFor my Fediversery, a reminder that NSA and CIA were probably on the fedi before you werewww.vice.com JoYo ( @JoYo@lemmy.ml ) Fediverse@lemmy.ml • 1 year ago message-square20fedilink
minus-square The Doctor ( @drwho@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilink2•1 year agoNSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
minus-square JoYo ( @JoYo@lemmy.ml ) OPlinkfedilink1•11 months agofair, I think JWICS was for DoD only.
minus-square The Doctor ( @drwho@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilink0•11 months agoI don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
minus-square JoYo ( @JoYo@lemmy.ml ) OPlinkfedilink2•11 months agoI thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug
minus-square The Doctor ( @drwho@lemmy.ml ) linkfedilink1•11 months agoIt wouldn’t surprise me. The definitely have a need for their own entirely separate network.
NSA? Yes. CIA? Probably not. They don’t have that kind of imagination. c.f., the internal parody of The Hunt for Red October they declassified about a decade ago.
fair, I think JWICS was for DoD only.
I don’t think JWICS is DoD only. In theory, any TLA or FLA that handles TS material, has a SCIF and a local JWICS LAN can’t be hooked into the rest of the JWICS network.
I thought NSA had a completely different one called Tapioca. /shrug
It wouldn’t surprise me. The definitely have a need for their own entirely separate network.