AI singer-songwriter ‘Anna Indiana’ debuted her first single ‘Betrayed by this Town’ on X, formerly Twitter—and listeners were not too impressed.
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 106•10 months ago
There can be nothing new or original out of AI because all of its inputs are stolen from what already exists. Real creativity comes solely from humans. Also, that clip - the song, singing, and visual - is dreadful in every way.
This needs to be hammered into techbro’s heads until they shut the fuck up about the so-called “AI” revolution.
- azimir ( @azimir@lemmy.ml ) 45•10 months ago
I’ve been doing a lot of using, testing, and evaluating LLMs and GPT-style models for generating code and text/prose. Some of it is just general use to see how it behaves, some has been explicit evaluation of creative writing, and a bunch of it is code generation to test out how we need to modify our CS curriculum in light of these new tools.
It’s an impressive piece of technology, but it’s not very creative. It’s meh. The results are meh. Which is to be expected since it’s a statistical model that’s using a large body of prior work to produce a reasonable approximation of what it’s seen before. It trends towards the mean, not the best.
- AgnosticMammal ( @AgnosticMammal@lemmy.zip ) 10•10 months ago
This’d explain why inexperienced users of ai would inevitably get mediocre results. Still takes creativity to get stolen mediocrity.
- TheMechanic ( @TheMechanic@lemmy.ca ) 13•10 months ago
You have to know how to operate the oven to reheat store bought pie. Generative LLMs are machines like ovens, and turning the knobs is not creativity. Not operating the oven correctly gets you Sharon Weiss results.
- anachronist ( @anachronist@midwest.social ) English3•10 months ago
I guess a protip is you have to tell it explicitly in the prompt who it’s supposed to steal from.
For instance, midjourney or SD will produce much better results if you put specific artstation channel names along with ‘artstation’ in the prompt.
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 7•10 months ago
I’m excited for how these tools will be used by human creators to accomplish things they could never do alone, and in that aspect it is a revolutionary technology. I hate that their marketing calls it “AI” though, the only intelligence involved is the human user that creates prompts and curates results.
- Unaware7013 ( @Unaware7013@kbin.social ) 4•10 months ago
and a bunch of it is code generation to test out how we need to modify our CS curriculum in light of these new tools.
I’m curious if you’ve gotten anything decent out of them. I’ve tried to use it for tech/code questions, and it’s been nothing but disappointment after disappointment. I’ve tried to use it to get help with new concepts, but it hallucinates like crazy and always give me bad results, some of the time it’s so bad that it gives me answers I’ve already told it we’re wrong.
- aiccount ( @aiccount@monyet.cc ) 3•10 months ago
Yeah, I’ve just set up a hotkey that says something like “back up your answer with multiple reputable sources” and I just always paste it at the end of everything I ask. If it can’t find webpages to show me to back up its claims then I can’t trust it. Of course this isn’t the case with coding, for that I can actually run the code to verify it.
- sour ( @sour@kbin.social ) 1•10 months ago
am use for end of year ai project for school
- AndrasKrigare ( @AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org ) 22•10 months ago
I get the sentiment, but don’t really agree. Humans’ inputs are also from what already exists, and music is generally inspired from other music which is why “genres” even exist. AI’s not there yet, but the statement “real creativity comes solely from humans” Needs Citation. Humans are a bunch of chemical reactions and firing synapses, nothing out of the realm of the possible for a computer.
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 6•10 months ago
the statement “real creativity comes solely from humans” Needs Citation.
Yeah, I’d actually make a more limited statement. Real creativity requires the subjective experience and the ability to generate inputs solely from subjectivity i.e. experience the redness of the color red. AI could definitely do that, which is why LLMs are not AI imo
- rynzcycle ( @rynzcycle@kbin.social ) 11•10 months ago
I see it an more an inability to analyze, evaluate, and edit. A lot of “creativity” in the world of musical composition is putting together existing elements and seeing what happens. Any composer from pop to the very avant-garde, is influenced and sometimes even borrow from their predecessors (it’s why copyright law is so complex in music).
It’s the ability to make judgements, does this sound good/interesting, does this have value, would anyone want to listen to this, and adjust accordingly that will lead to something original and great. Humans are so good at this, we might be making edits before the notes hit the page (Brainstorming). This AI clearly wasn’t. And deciding on value, seems wildly complex for modern day computers. Humans can agree on it (if you like Rock, but hate country for example).
So in the end, they are “creative” but in a monkey-typewritter situation, but who is going to sort through the billions of songs like this to find the one masterpiece?
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 2•10 months ago
I see it an more an inability to analyze, evaluate, and edit.
I believe that’s vital to the creative process, but yeah, I basically agree.
- JWBananas ( @JWBananas@startrek.website ) English2•10 months ago
Plenty of humans make those judgements about their own creations. And plenty of them get a shock when they release their creations to the masses and don’t get the praise that they expected.
- helenslunch ( @helenslunch@feddit.nl ) 9•10 months ago
Hate to break it to you but human creativity doesn’t exist in a vacuum. You call it theft, artists call it inspiration.
- Cagi ( @Cagi@lemmy.ca ) 8•10 months ago
“Generative” is such a misleading term. It’s not generating anything, it is replicative.
- Kbin_space_program ( @Kbin_space_program@kbin.social ) 8•10 months ago
It’s not the techbros leading this, it’s the BBAs and MBAs that wouldn’t know art if Michelangelo came to life and slapped them in the face with the sistine chapel.
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 11•10 months ago
I would never call an actual technician a techbro! Techbros are Rick&Morty ledditor “fuck yeah science!” dorks.
- Hubi ( @Hubi@feddit.de ) 6•10 months ago
Still, AI is able to “create” new things by a combination of existing concepts. It can generate a Roomba in the style of Van Gogh for example, which is probably not something that currently exists.
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 7•10 months ago
“Roomba in the style of Van Gogh” is a new combination of existing things, but it can never create something truly original. Derivative.
- Feddyteddy ( @Feddyteddy@lemmy.sdf.org ) 10•10 months ago
What is an example of something that is truly original and not derivative?
- Hubi ( @Hubi@feddit.de ) 4•10 months ago
- InquisitiveFactotum ( @InquisitiveFactotum@midwest.social ) English2•10 months ago
But all of human creation is derivative.
- Echo Dot ( @echodot@feddit.uk ) 5•10 months ago
Right just as soon as all the people proclaiming that can point to the soul bit of my brain. There is absolutely no reason to say that AI cannot be creative there’s nothing fundamentally magic about creativity that means only humans can do it.
- TheActualDevil ( @TheActualDevil@sffa.community ) 5•10 months ago
You’re equating creativity to the soul. They’re not the same thing. But we can definitely look at the brain and see what parts light up when perform creative tasks.
- Echo Dot ( @echodot@feddit.uk ) 2•10 months ago
Right so why can’t the same sections be simulated? If you accept that the human brain is simply an organic implementation of a neural network, then you have to accept that a synthetic implementation can achieve the same thing.
The idea that the human brain is special is ludicrous and completely without evidence
- TheActualDevil ( @TheActualDevil@sffa.community ) 1•10 months ago
I mean, I’m not arguing anything other than your false equivalent. I’m sure, at some point, we’ll be able to mimic how the human brain actually works, not just imitate the results. But we’re not even close right now. Not in the same ball park. Not in the same tri-state area. We still don’t really understand how it does what it does completely. We know some of the processes, and understand that’s it’s chemicals interacting with the meat in some way, but it’s still mostly kinda just weird stuff our body does. We’re mostly just pointing at areas that light up with activity when we do a thing and saying “yep, that’s the general area that’s doing stuff.”
And that’s just understanding it, let alone figuring out how to imitate it with technology. And none of those parts of the brain work independently. They’re spread out and they overlap and exchange and change information constantly, all with chemicals. Getting a computer to mimic the outcome is still something we’re far from, but without the same processes, its not really gonna come out the same. We’ve got just… so long to go before we actually get close to simulating a human brain.
And just for fun, I do think this line of yours is funny:
The idea that the human brain is special is ludicrous and completely without evidence
Again, I wasn’t saying anything of any sort, and I’m still not really taking any stance beyond “that shits complicated and we’re not there yet.” But you’re supposing that a “synthetic implementation can achieve the same thing.” … without supporting evidence. This argument was clearly meant for someone else, but it’s not really fair to demand evidence from someone for their claim when you don’t support your own. Jumping to the conclusion that something is impossible is the same as assuming it’s definitely possible. You don’t know that. I don’t know that. No one really knows that until it’s done.
- Mahlzeit ( @Mahlzeit@feddit.de ) 3•10 months ago
The belief that only humans can be creative is interestingly parallel to intelligent design creationism. The latter is fundamentally a religious faith, but it strongly appeals to the intuition that anything that happens needs a humanoid creator.
- Knusper ( @Knusper@feddit.de ) 1•10 months ago
I don’t think, the human brain is special either, but we are still two big steps ahead IMHO:
- We can perceive what we’ve generated, to judge whether it’s good or bad.
- We perceive many, many inputs throughout our lives. Not just text, visuals, audio, but also taste, smell, touch and more. To be simultaneously creative and relatable to humans, AIs would need to be equipped with these concepts and would need to be given ‘memories’, which are fleshed out with all these kinds of input.
- aiccount ( @aiccount@monyet.cc ) 2•10 months ago
Yes, it is literally impossible for any AI to ever exist that can be creative. At no point in the future will it ever create anything creative, that is something only human beings can do. Anybody that doesn’t understand this is simply incapable of using logic and they have no right to contribute to the conversation at all. This has all already been decided by people who understand things really well and anyone who objects is obviously stupid.
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 4•10 months ago
Good job tearing down that strawman! 🙄
- aiccount ( @aiccount@monyet.cc ) 2•10 months ago
I was agreeing with you. I’m so sick of people thinking that “someday AI might be creative”. Like no, it’s literally impossible unless some day AI becomes human(impossible) because human is the only thing capable of creativity. What have I said that you disagree with? You’re not one of them are you? What’s with all this obsessive AI love?
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 5•10 months ago
LLMs aren’t intelligent. They’re jumped up chatbots lol
- aiccount ( @aiccount@monyet.cc ) 2•10 months ago
Yeah the current popular LLMs, absolutely they are, you couldn’t be more right.
We were talking about “AI” though. Are you implying that you think some day AI might be capable of creativity, and that creativity isn’t strictly a human trait?
- queermunist she/her ( @queermunist@lemmy.ml ) 4•10 months ago
I put “AI” in scare quotes specifically because I do not believe we are having an “AI revolution”. These are not AI.
I think AI can exist but that’s not what we have right now. What we have are jumped up algos that can somewhat fake it.
- aiccount ( @aiccount@monyet.cc ) 2•10 months ago
Even those future “real” AIs are going to be taking in human input and regurgitating it back to us. The only difference is that the algorithms processing the data will continue to get better and better. There is not some cutoff where we go from 100% unintelligent chatbot to 100% intelligent AI. It is a gradual spectrum.
- AndrasKrigare ( @AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org ) 3•10 months ago
Oh shit, I thought you had forgotten a “/s” at the end, but reading your other comments this is actually what you believe and how you talk. So… yeah, I’m not going to take someone who cites “people who understand things really well” as a source at face value.
- aiccount ( @aiccount@monyet.cc ) 2•10 months ago
Well then you didn’t read very many of my comments. I made this first comment because the post I responded to was so absurd so I just exaggerated the ridiculousness that they said. Of course AI is capable of creativity and intelligence. If you look at the long back and forth that this sparked you would see that this is my stance. After I made this over the top, very sarcastic comment, OP corrected themself to clarify that when they said “AI” they actually only meant the current state of LLMs. They have since admitted that it is indeed true that AI absolutely can be capable of creativity and intelligence.
- AndrasKrigare ( @AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org ) 1•10 months ago
No, I didn’t read the entirety of the comments you’ve made, I read your comment and the one you replied to. As a general rule, I (and I’d assume most people) read down a thread before replying, and don’t first look through all of everyone’s comment histories
- aiccount ( @aiccount@monyet.cc ) 1•10 months ago
Alright, no big deal. But yeah, your’re gut instinct was correct when you assumed there was a missing /s. I don’t really like the /s that much, especially in situations where it is so obvious.
If you had read down through this thread first then you would have seen the obviousness of the /s. I don’t think my comment history outside of this thread would have done much since I don’t generally talk about this stuff. I just meant if you had looked more than a couple comments in this particular back and forth discussion.
- Hyperreality ( @Hyperreality@kbin.social ) 2•10 months ago
Meat goes in. Sausage comes out.
The problem for a lot of the companies behind these things, is that they’ve run into problems now their investors want them to turn meat into a black forest gateau.
I’m sceptical if they can manage that feat. But what do I know.
- FaceDeer ( @FaceDeer@kbin.social ) 20•10 months ago
Lots of hostility, but that’s to be expected. Research has shown that humans generally like AI-generated content as long as they don’t know it’s AI generated content, and when they find out they switch over to hating it.
It’s simply bias. It’ll go away eventually.
- BruceTwarzen ( @BruceTwarzen@kbin.social ) 2•10 months ago
People can call ai generated movie shit or boring or whatever all they want, but i heard for example Henry styles watermelon sugar high, that song was popular as hell, and it might as well just be ai generated mambo jambo
- duncesplayed ( @duncesplayed@lemmy.one ) English1•10 months ago
Seriously, my thought was “I have friends who have Soundclouds that sound worse than this”. But I don’t call my friends’ music “just brutal” or “dreadful in every way”.
- PoisonedPrisonPanda ( @PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de ) 19•10 months ago
Looking at the hateful comments gives me shivers when thinking how humans will proceed with machines on an emotional level.
If we ever reach sentinent AI, it will go towards I-Robot plot. Ill bet.
Edit typos
- aksdb ( @aksdb@feddit.de ) 10•10 months ago
Or Battlestar Galactica. Create a new species, make them humanoid, make them sentient, and then treat them like shit. Great.
- Contend6248 ( @Contend6248@feddit.de ) 6•10 months ago
iRobot and WALL-E soon to be facts
- twei ( @twei@feddit.de ) 4•10 months ago
I’m sorry, Dave
- Mahlzeit ( @Mahlzeit@feddit.de ) 2•10 months ago
I have been thinking the exact same.
Better movie comparison: A.I. Artificial Intelligence by Steven Spielberg
- PoisonedPrisonPanda ( @PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de ) 1•10 months ago
Brendan gleesan was really in every fucking (good) movie at that time…
- Jamie ( @Jamie@jamie.moe ) 16•10 months ago
I have a feeling they knew how this would be received considering it seems like they’re rage-baiting and acting pretentious to try and get attention.
- Jamie ( @Jamie@jamie.moe ) 6•10 months ago
I accidentally submitted early, but also, I wrote out the lyrics. It’s the most bland version of those breakup-depression kind of songs imaginable. I guess people voted it as “feel-good” out of irony.
Sitting at my favorite cafe
Sipping my tea it’s saturday
Thinking about all he’s done, to everyone
This town is full of broken dreams
Shattered hopes, and silent screams
Somebody please help me
Betrayed by this town
Let’s tear it all down
We’re all just destined to fall
I’ve lost it all
Betrayed by this town
Let’s tear it all down
We’re all just destined to fall
We’ve lost it all
Alone in the streets, alone in my thoughts
Thinking of all our favorite spots
I thought someday things might turn around
But I was lost and never found
Betrayed by this town
Let’s tear it all down
We’re all just destined to fall
I’ve lost it all
Betrayed by this town
Let’s tear it all down
We’re all just destined to fall
We’ve lost it all
Faces painted with smiles
Lies are told
A facade of unity
A vitality sold
So I sit here in silence
Just wondering how
To rewrite the tales
This town won’t allow
Betrayed by this town
Let’s tear it all down
We’re all just destined to fall
I’ve lost it all
Betrayed by this town
Let’s tear it all down
We’re all just destined to fall
We’ve lost it all
I’ve lost it all
We’ve lost it all
- Steve ( @SteveKLord@slrpnk.net ) 8•10 months ago
“Betrayed by this town / Let’s burn it all down “ might be the most relevant chorus of today’s music. It’ll be stuck in my head all night and would fit right in at most protests
- Jeena ( @jeena@jemmy.jeena.net ) 16•10 months ago
I think in the context of K-Pop it makes total sense, the music and everything around is anyway just done after a formula which has proven to work very well to sell. While right now you need to put children and teenagers through years of rigorous training and expose them to immense stress and pressure so most of them break, with AI you can easily replicate the same formula and refine much quicker without throwing so many young people into the meat grinder of the music industry.
More money and control for the companies less people killing themselves.
The ones who really burn for the music will make music despite AI music being available. And they also will find an audience, even though it might be smaller.
- reksas ( @reksas@sopuli.xyz ) 7•10 months ago
What I worry about this is mainstream becoming “accustomed” to assemblyline content by AI. What if eventually people start actually consider the conformity to be good thing and originality deviant? Of course there will always be people who dont care what other think but vast majority of people seems to at least on some level be very conscious about it.
Imagine being the weird one just because you don’t like ai generated crap
- Jeena ( @jeena@jemmy.jeena.net ) 5•10 months ago
Have you seen the movie WALL-E? The people on the space-ship they’re consuming engaging content all day long, nobody is creating anything anymore, so all this must been created by the AI. I’m just trying to say that it’s not a novel idea. Writers and artists have been imagining this future for ourselves for a long time.
- The Doctor ( @drwho@beehaw.org ) English3•10 months ago
When you think about it, that’s pretty much the history of boy bands, going all the way back to the Monkees. The faces were carefully chosen for demographic reasons, the songs were written by the labels and targeted for specific demographics, the faces’ histories were largely constructed fictions (and published through “unauthorized” fan magazines and books that were ghostwritten by the labels and laundered through other publishing companies). The only real difference is that now software is being used for it rather than marketing teams.
- reksas ( @reksas@sopuli.xyz ) 3•10 months ago
well, at least there is less human suffering involved now
- TheActualDevil ( @TheActualDevil@sffa.community ) 6•10 months ago
While right now you need to put children and teenagers through years of rigorous training and expose them to immense stress and pressure so most of them break
Uh… I don’t think that’s a necessary part of the process to making k-pop, or any kind of music. Industry people may think it’s critical to making themselves shit-loads of money, but it’s not important for the creation music or even selling the music.
- Jeena ( @jeena@jemmy.jeena.net ) 4•10 months ago
Yeah, that’s what I meant with the rest of my text that people will make music still, and this corporate breaking the children and teenagers can be replaced by AI.
- Ilovethebomb ( @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee ) 14•10 months ago
That picture is weird, there’s some AI nonsense going on with the microphone shock mount, and her jaw doesn’t line up with the rest of her face. Plus the usual uncanny valley weirdness of an AI generated image.
Not even going to bother with the song.
- INHALE_VEGETABLES ( @INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone ) 3•10 months ago
But it’s so bad you have to
- Dizzy Devil Ducky ( @AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee ) English3•10 months ago
It’s not worth giving any attention to so it doesn’t spread any further.
- INHALE_VEGETABLES ( @INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone ) 1•10 months ago
Yeah but like you gotta
- Flaky ( @Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi ) English12•10 months ago
Not so much an expert rather than just parroting what I saw, but according to a cursory search, and a Twitter community note I saw from a friend, the voice used by this project is Synthesizer V, which is actually a perfectly legitimate piece of software for using digital voices in music production. If you’ve heard of Vocaloid, or know about Hatsune Miku, SynthV is basically a competitor in that space.
Going back to the community note, the voice used is actually called Natalie, and apparently the TOS of SynthV does not allow use of its voices using a name that’s different to what was given. So they essentially can’t present the Natalie voice as Anna, which they are.
EDIT: I want to clarify that these voice synthesisers like SynthV and Vocaloid are usually based on the recording of someone who has consented to the use of their voice in that regard and has been paid for it. It’s not like the current AI voice cloning trend going on.
Tweet + Community Note
- xep ( @xep@kbin.social ) 3•10 months ago
Thank you, I was wondering about the voice synthesis and if it was part of the AI model they used.
- Flaky ( @Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi ) English1•10 months ago
No prob! These digital voices have been around for over a decade now, maybe more. Some of them use “AI” to improve the sound of the voice (i.e. support more languages than actually recorded, make it sound realistic) but not in the way that current AI voice trends are going.
- 1984 ( @1984@lemmy.today ) 9•10 months ago
I think it sounds the same as other shitty music I hear all the time.
I fully expect AI music to be part of the musical scene going forward.
Does it feel dystopian? Yeah, it’s not a fun future. But this is here to stay.
- Omega_Haxors ( @Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml ) 2•10 months ago
AI music can be fire if you use it as a part of the artistic process, not as the end result. It’s just every fucking technocracker wants to replace the artistic process completely so they don’t have to not pay their employees any more. EDIT: Actual AI, not that OpenAI content laundering shit.
- anothermember ( @anothermember@beehaw.org ) 9•10 months ago
I don’t understand why people are so cynical about this, it seems like a harmless demonstration of the current state of the technology.
- neptune ( @neptune@dmv.social ) English4•10 months ago
If you were a professional musician your opinion might be different?
- ani ( @ani@endlesstalk.org ) 3•10 months ago
How so? It’s pretty good, wait a few years and it will definitely be as good or better than human musicians. If you’re talking as if it is a treat to musicians, they can only adapt and use such techs to push forward. All professions that require reasoning are endangered, not only music.
- rabirabirara ( @rabirabirara@programming.dev ) 1•10 months ago
I am a musician and I like the technology (even wanted to do research on music generation in uni), but I still think the notion that music generation will surpass human capabilities in a few years is naive.
- neptune ( @neptune@dmv.social ) English2•10 months ago
Surpass, likely not. Yet make the career no longer financially viable?
- anothermember ( @anothermember@beehaw.org ) 2•10 months ago
Most people aren’t professional musicians though.
- neptune ( @neptune@dmv.social ) English2•10 months ago
Ok
- Stephen304 ( @Stephen304@lemmy.ml ) 9•10 months ago
Watching the video and the head movement all I see is the Balenciaga ai meme
- saigot ( @saigot@lemmy.ca ) 7•10 months ago
YouTube link for those that want to see it for themselves. ~~https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3T175LTQFnw~~ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l71Hh1gPkE
To me the biggest problem with it is that it doesn’t understand the relationship between the meanings of the words and the melody of the song. It kinda makes it sound like a bad parody song. I think if you looked at just the lyrics or just the melody they would be quite convincing on their own.
- onlinepersona ( @onlinepersona@programming.dev ) English2•10 months ago
It’s… not that bad. There’s pop out there on the radio that’s worse.
- Omega_Haxors ( @Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml ) 3•10 months ago
pop’s an extremely low bar.
- averyminya ( @averyminya@beehaw.org ) 2•10 months ago
And extremely popular bar. Hence why it’s low.
- Omega_Haxors ( @Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml ) 2•10 months ago
What the fuck WHY WOULD THEY PIN THAT??
AI owners can’t be normal if they tried.
- saigot ( @saigot@lemmy.ca ) 2•10 months ago
So my bad, this video is not made by the creators of the song, but by an anti-AI person, they added the subtitles, the cutaways to evil robots and the weird message at the end. They are also called “Big Data Analytics”.
Here’s something that looks more legit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0l71Hh1gPkE
- Omega_Haxors ( @Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml ) 2•10 months ago
OK my bad then, that’s still a really terrible thing to pin on your channel.
- CCMan1701A ( @CCMan1701A@startrek.website ) 7•10 months ago
Waiting for the AI composer site where I can prompt it for music based on a story I provide.
- BeigeAgenda ( @BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca ) 8•10 months ago
Hmm. Human Music. I like it.
- DeltaTangoLima ( @DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com ) English5•10 months ago
We already have Taylor Swift, though?
- CCMan1701A ( @CCMan1701A@startrek.website ) 3•10 months ago
Exactly
- kingthrillgore ( @KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml ) 3•10 months ago
“her song”
That’s cute
- ArugulaZ ( @ArugulaZ@kbin.social ) 3•10 months ago
I can’t wait for Commander Data’s Greatest Love Songs collection. He sings with such soullessness!
- Lucas A. ( @heyazorin@lemmy.ml ) 1•10 months ago
no way!