• Jeena ( jeena@jemmy.jeena.net ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don’t understand why the article writes that iMessage is the only way for encrypted messaging between Android and iOS. I can thing of several off the top of my head:

    • Matrix
    • Signal
    • WhatsApp
    • Facebook Messanger (very soon)
    • Threema
    • Telegram
    • Viber
    • Line
    • Skype

    And there are surly more …

    • vrighter ( vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      telegram is not encrypted by default, and does its best to make you forget to enable it for each individual contact. if you want to do a group chat, you’re out of luck.

      Telegram is only (partially) secure for pedantic power users, which most people aren’t.

        • vrighter ( vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          so, relative to pretty much all other messaging services, it might as well not be.

          You’re saying “by default not everyone can read your messages, only you, the recipient, telegram themselves and anyone who they might decide to share them with, with neither your consent, nor knowledge”

          When compared to “nobody except you and the recipient” that becomes effectively equivalent to “nothing”.

          also, not end-to-end ever when it comes to group chats

      • Jeena ( jeena@jemmy.jeena.net ) deleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        I assume that if people are too lazy to switch to a solution which works for every one then they are not very interested in talking to you anyway.

        • Mongostein ( Mongostein@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Except it’s not a solution that works for everyone. It’s 9 solutions. If it were one it would be a lot easier.

          7 once you take out the ones owned by Facebook.

  • soulfirethewolf ( soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    So many of these comments are pulling up the other encrypted alternatives that you can use between iPhone and other platforms. But few seem to actually be addressing the problem of actually getting other non-tech savvy people to use this stuff because they don’t actually see a problem with what they have.

    You may not realize it, but not everyone is thinking about whether or not their messages are encrypted. My own family looks at me like “🤨” when I try to convince them to use something encrypted, like I’m trying to hide a crime or something. And I’ve only gotten my parents to use other services (WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger with end to encryption turned on) by digging my heels to get them to stop using SMS. I still haven’t convinced my almost 16-year-old sister (she doesn’t really message me that much anyway. But she’s in that phase where she thinks she’s all independent, and her first places are the simple stuff she knows).

    Might I add that digging your heels at every attempt for someone to use SMS isn’t socially acceptable. I’ve only done it because they’re family and I love them

  • Flaky ( Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    Serious question since I don’t use iMessage whatsoever, what’s going on with the iMessage stuff? Seems like multiple companies recently have tried to make apps that connect to iMessage, but there’s nothing I’ve heard about Apple opening that up. Did something happen for this to suddenly pop up more frequently?

    • BearOfaTime ( BearOfaTime@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      Pretty much it’s the Beeper devs and one other. But the initial setups were really nothing more than using a Mac on the backend with a an adapter to Android.

      Beeper and one (maybe two) other were pretty effective at it.

      Beeper Mini is a different thing altogether. It uses a service to translate ANP (Apple Notification Protocol?) to GCM (Google Cloud Messaging), which are the respective notification handlers.

      The Android client is able to comm directly with iMessage servers, unlike the original Beeper and the other ones.

  • misk ( misk@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Beeper already fixed iMessage on Beeper Cloud and is working on restoring Beeper Mini. Might take some back and forth but it still wouldn’t be surprise if it makes their reimplementation more resilient to Apple tampering.

  • Mongostein ( Mongostein@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    Lots of sarcastic comments in here, but Beeper’s method was to literally spoof the serial numbers and whatnot of real machines. Do people really not see how that would be a problem?