sunnie ( sunnie@sopuli.xyz ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 years agolinux rulesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square36linkfedilinkarrow-up1609
arrow-up1609imagelinux rulesopuli.xyzsunnie ( sunnie@sopuli.xyz ) to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 years agomessage-square36linkfedilink
minus-squarecommie ( commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years ago the amount of food it requires to feed the meat we eat is extremely wasteful a lot of what we give livestock are parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat. that’s the opposite of wasteful.
minus-squaremax ( max@feddit.nl ) linkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 years agoParts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
minus-squarecommie ( commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years agoi’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
minus-squareFaydaikin ( Faydaikin@beehaw.org ) linkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-211 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarecommie ( commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 years ago And he’s talking about crops specifically grown for livestock. what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.
a lot of what we give livestock are parts of plants that people can’t or won’t eat. that’s the opposite of wasteful.
Parts of plans that were specifically grown for livestock that we won’t eat, that is. At least a big part.
i’m talking about waste product from our crops, like cottonseed from the textile industry or soymeal leftover from making soybean oil or silage.
deleted by creator
what i said was true. what they said wasn’t nuance, it was stated as a contradiction. your framing of it as nuance is a red herring.