I see people hate snap packaging and removing of their OS support it. Is it because it’s fully open-source or just due to how the technology works?
I see people hate snap packaging and removing of their OS support it. Is it because it’s fully open-source or just due to how the technology works?
This threads got lots of good answers, but I haven’t seen it mentioned that snaps sometimes mean reduced functionality.
Use the docker snap? Sorry, it can only access your home directory so no -v /some/path:/somewhere for you
Use firefox or chromium and keepassxc? Sorry, your browser plugin won’t be able to talk to your password manager
And the updates… dear god. In whose mind was it a good idea to show a “firefox is updating, exit now to avoid issues” TWO WEEKS im advance. Closing the app does precisely fuck all unless you manually snap refresh it
Containerised applications are a fine idea, but snap is a horrible implementation of it
Didn’t know that about the docker snap but that is insane. It would be straight up unusable at work for me.
To be fair, those are both issues with flatpak too. You can change the file system permissions with a command or flatseal, but I don’t know of a fix for the password extension issue.
In general the integration of flatpak is quite good (even more if we compare it with snap), but there are still some gaps. In this case there are some solutions like this one.
Install Node with snap? Cypress silently closes. (This took some time to get to the bottom of)