“glowfic” apparently. written in a roleplay forum format.

This is not a story for kids, even less so than HPMOR. There is romance, there is sex, there are deliberately bad kink practices whose explicit purpose is to get people to actually hurt somebody else so that they’ll end up damned to Hell, and also there’s math.

start here. or don’t, of course.

  •  blakestacey   ( @blakestacey@awful.systems ) M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    From a downvoted comment:

    Because players aren’t sure where a story is going and can’t edit previous sections, the stories tend to be plagued by pacing problems- scenes that could be a paragraph are dragged out over pages, important plot beats are glossed over, and so on. It’s also very rare that players are able to pull off the kind of coordination necessary for satisfying narrative buildup and payoff, and the focus on player character interaction tends to leave a lot of necessary story scaffolding like scene setting and NPC interaction badly lacking.

    If your goal in writing this was in part to promote or socially explore these utopian ideas rather than just to enjoy a forum game, it may be worth considering ways to mitigate these issues- to modify the Glowfic formula to better accommodate an audience.

    Yud’s response:

    We are both experienced authors not in need of this advice at this level.

    ``

    •  swlabr   ( @swlabr@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Editing? Where we’re going, we don’t need editing!” - Absolutely not Eliezer. Too succinct.

      In my pursuit of clarity and precision, the art of composition itself becomes a meticulous process of refining ideas. Each word is a deliberate stroke, contributing to the coherence of thought, rendering traditional editing superfluous. The absence of formal editing is a deliberate choice, reflecting the belief that the initial act of creation captures the most authentic expression of my intellectual journey.

      Now that is what yud1 might say.

      1: By Yud I mean a 99.9% accurate simulation of Yud using ChatGPT, which, according to rationalist doctrine, is the same thing.

      •  froztbyte   ( @froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ooh, there’s an idea. Train a LLM on his logorrhoea, output to a variety of places (as often with his face on a profile as not), and watch the little man twist himself up as he tries to position being okay with it while also really hating that it’s happening

  •  swlabr   ( @swlabr@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is romance, there is sex, there are deliberately bad kink practices whose explicit purpose is to get people to actually hurt somebody else

    The fact that this isn’t just a ratfic of My Immortal is cowardice to the highest degree

    Also, I will mention it every time it comes up: “dath ilan” is an anagram of thailand and there just has to be a reason, dammit.

    •  David Gerard   ( @dgerard@awful.systems ) OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hi my name is Eliezer Rationa’lity Sanity Raven Jaynes and I have long ebony black hair (that’s how I got my name) with libertarian streaks and helpful tips that reaches my mid-back and icy blue eyes like limpid tears and a lot of people tell me I look like Robin Hanson (AN: if u don’t know who he is get da hell out of here!). I’m not related to E. T. Jaynes but I wish I was because he’s a major fucking hottie.

    •  David Gerard   ( @dgerard@awful.systems ) OPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      “Oh! Oh! Oh! ” I screamed. I was beginning to get an insight. We started to post everywhere and my pale body became all warm. And then….

      “WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING YOU MOTHERFUKERS!”

      It was…………………………………………………….Kahneman!

  •  Evinceo   ( @Evinceo@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ok, I tried giving it a fair shake, and I guess it’s got the same problem as every other forum roleplay: it’s fun to roleplay, not fun to read someone else’s roleplay.

    •  swlabr   ( @swlabr@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, that’s where I’m at. I don’t think this is Yud doing HPMOR and trying to rope randos into rationality. Well, maybe he’s trying to rope the non-rat glowfic enjoyers, idk. In any case, this is Yud playing with a pal and having fun, I guess? Take that as you will.

      •  gerikson   ( @gerikson@awful.systems ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        As long as he’s writing collab forum pr0n and not hindering the creation of the Acausal Robot God, it’s all good.

        Edit Yud is living disproof of the thesis that spending a large number of hours doing something makes one good at it.

          •  Evinceo   ( @Evinceo@awful.systems ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            I can’t understand people who watch streams of other people playing D&D but I know those are wildly popular.

            I suppose people also watch other people play video games which is about the point where I started to feel like a confused out of touch elder.

            •  swlabr   ( @swlabr@awful.systems ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 years ago

              While I don’t listen to any “narrative play” podcasts (as I’ve heard them labelled as) I do listen to an amount of improv based podcasts. So on some level I understand the appeal. Also if you like comic books or blaseball or anything lore-heavy, that would be adjacent to narrative play.

              Let’s plays are speedrun adjacent so I also kinda like them. That being said that’s just what I get out of them. Everything I enjoy I have in mind that it ain’t for everyone (boy I wish it were for more people though…)

            • I love DnD and TTRPGs. I even love watching some streams when the quality is high. But I’m with you slides in pocket protector I don’t generally like this new wave of people who bring the expectation to my tables that every scene and every situation is a massive mellow drama mary sue projection for their OC that must be maximized.

              What was that about wit and brevity? Simple done well?

            •  froztbyte   ( @froztbyte@awful.systems ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’ll occasionally watch people play something that I deem as “looks interesting, but not enough so that I’ll want to purchase and play this myself”

              (Also for watching high-skill players do their thing, but that’s a different dynamic I think)

  • I should have listened to the content warning because literally everything the main character (I shall call him Math Elk) says or thinks is completely insufferable rationalist buzzword babbling. Couldn’t make it past two pages.

    It wasn’t an auspicious start when he gets on the plane and immediately treats a social interaction with a woman like a dang financial transaction. OK kept reading, maybe the main character comes from the planet of weird insufferable nerds on purpose.

    It got unbearable when Math Elk did nothing but spew nonsense at Carissa and she seemed weirdly OK with it despite not being a weird nerd. Couldn’t maintain suspension of disbelief.

  •  bitofhope   ( @bitofhope@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    So if you read Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, and thought…

    I did read HPOMR and I also thought!

    "You know, HPMOR is pretty good

    OK, I didn’t exactly think that. But go on.

    so far as it goes; but Harry is much too cautious and doesn’t have nearly enough manic momentum,

    Dunno about Harry, but the story as a whole could have done with some momentum, manic or otherwise.

    his rationality lectures aren’t long enough, and all of his personal relationships are way way way too healthy."

    Nobody in their right mind would ever think any of this.

  •  Steve   ( @fasterandworse@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    this story takes place in a totalitarian state ruled by the literal forces of literal Hell

    Look, I’m giving it a go but the very first line of the content warnings is a case of “is this written by a grown man or a 14 year old emo kid”

  •  Steve   ( @fasterandworse@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    also, thanks for the intro to “glowfic” - for a good chunk of my 20s I was obsessed with my side project which I called “plotplant” (dorky?) which was an infinitely forkable collaborative writing app. I never got it past a few different build attempts because I would always get caught in the weeds of how, if it were successful, the complexity of a story that had loads of branches would be navigated. My own personal xanadu. Anyway, this glowfic looks like a nightmare scenario that would keep me in them weeds, ruminating, “there has to be a better way!”

    It’s so hard to read when every bit has all that meta info next to it! Written by Eliezer or not

    •  swlabr   ( @swlabr@awful.systems ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      actually I found this ancient text online that helps explain everything:

      Eliezer Monogatari, chapter 69:

      On his mighty steed Oververbosity, Eliezer is fast approaching the cliff edge overlooking the dreaded Chasm of Unreadability. His desire to cram more words and IQfulness into his text has deafened him to the wails of the Ghost of Editors Past, begging him to at least paste into Google Docs and fix a few squigglies.

      In a moment of rational brilliance, he casts Bayesian Reasoning and epiphanisationalises that he can Just Add Metainfo to every line, exponentially increasing his QLAWPW (quality of life adjusted words per word), making him The Greatest Author. His loyal mount leaps into the air over the abyss, buoyed by clouds of self-delusion.

      Of course, he crashes and falls into the chasm. But what’s this? The miasma of unreadability… it’s more clouds of self-delusion generated by the cult of TREACLES! He rises, unscathed, head three sizes bigger than before.1

      1: Scholars are divided on whether this is because the toxic miasma mutated his sense of self-worth or if he hit his head on the chasm floor and it swelled. We will never know.

  •  Soyweiser   ( @Soyweiser@awful.systems ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Why do both Scotts and Eliezers pseudonyms end with ‘ain’? Yvain and Iarwain.

    Edit: and small frustration what is up with the lack of timestamps? I know the internet is getting worse and worse with those replacing the ‘posted at 22 feb 2022’ with ‘posted 1 year ago’ things (as predicted in the transmetropolitan), or just having sites autoupdate the timestamps to seem current for the google ranking (saw a ‘2024’ guide which in the text still talked about 2023 and had a mid 2023 timestamp, so somebody messed up a script there). But no timestamps at all is a bit odd, the only timestamp I saw was ‘Jan 19, 2024, 3:29 PM’ and that looks suspiciously like ‘now’.

  • Interesting commentary on LessWrong

    I don’t think this would fit into the 2022 review. Project Lawful has been quite influential, but I find it hard to imagine a way its impact could be included in a best-of.

    Including this post in particular strikes me as misguided, as it contains none of the interesting ideas and lessons from Project Lawful, and thus doesn’t make any intellectual progress.

    One could try to do the distillation of finding particularly interesting or enlightening passages from the text, but that would be

    • A huge amount of work[1], but maybe David Udell’s sequence could be used for that.

    • Quite difficult for the more subtle lessons, which are interwoven in the text.

    I have nothing against Project Lawful in particular[2], but I think that including this post would be misguided, and including passages from Project Lawful would be quite difficult.

    For that reason, I’m giving this a -1.