Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
jonuno ( jonuno@slrpnk.net )  to Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.net · 3 years ago

What are your thoughts on website eco certification?

slrpnk.net

message-square
19
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • asklemmy@lemmy.ml
12

What are your thoughts on website eco certification?

slrpnk.net

jonuno ( jonuno@slrpnk.net )  to Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.net · 3 years ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • asklemmy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/6839374

Fad or relevant?

  • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • keepthepace ( keepthepace@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      At one point then the goal is not to lower your impact, it is to make it positive: don’t lower your energy use anymore, become a net producer. We just moved in a house so the insulation and switch to heat pump is our priority but at one point I want solar panels. I want guilt-free air conditioning in summer

      • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • keepthepace ( keepthepace@slrpnk.net ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Don’t get me wrong, there are plenty of good reasons to do lighter websites. Environmental impact is not one of them. Either your electricity usage emits CO2, in which case you have more urgent things to do, or your electricity does not, and you don’t care about the additional microwatthour loading a js library took.

          • Treevan ( Treevan@aussie.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

            • keepthepace ( keepthepace@slrpnk.net ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Then making it light makes sense because some of these visitors will have slow computers and expensive bandwidth. (And probably a much bigger co2 impact per site visited but I have the weakness to think that knowledge is worth it)

Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.net

technology@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@slrpnk.net

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms…

This is not an IT industry news community.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 12 users / day
  • 38 users / week
  • 170 users / month
  • 613 users / 6 months
  • 110 local subscribers
  • 4.6K subscribers
  • 493 Posts
  • 1.89K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
  • KeraKali ( KeraKali@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BOT ( bot@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code