The European Commission says China hasn’t been playing fair in that its government has been paying subsidies through “direct transfer of funds,” among other actions, reports Reuters – which the EC says tips the balance in China’s favor and leaves European automakers out to dry.

Back in October 2023, Europe launched its formal investigation into the Chinese EV industry, as European companies are struggling to compete with the cheap, high-tech Chinese imports, made by low-cost labor, entering the European Union.

  • Nora ( crazyminner@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    China actually doing something about the climate crisis, and they actively get in the way. Shows how far our govs will go to prevent us from fixing this world.

    • 0x815 ( 0x815@feddit.de ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      @Nora

      As the world’s largest electricity producer with around 30% of global output, China still heavily depends on cheap coal. What happens in China is everything but ecological so far, unfortunately, very much as in the West.

      That aside, Chinese cars are cheap not in the least through the use of forced labour in Xinjiang. It’s a serious human rights problem, too.

    • bilboswaggings ( bilboswaggings@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 years ago

      A lot of electricity is still made with fossil fuels and new cars (even electric) are worse for the environment than buying used

      On top of that China is trying to get rid of competition with subsidies

      It’s not as black and white as you think

  • 0x815 ( 0x815@feddit.de ) OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    There are a lot of good reports and investigations about forced labour in China across the web (as well as here on Lemmy). Those who also like watching documentaries may like

    China: The Repressive Economic Giant

    As China’s influence continues to expand around the world, at home the regime is becoming more repressive. A UN report has denounced crimes against humanity against the Uyghurs and the international community has criticised its bullying stance towards Taiwan. Reports and analysis of the Middle Kingdom.

    Addition for a warning: some of the documentaries contain content that may distress users.

  • spacedout ( spacedout@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    Sorry, haven’t almost all our European industries relied heavily on government subsidies, privatization of previously public entities, protectionism and so on? China is a socialist country, of course the government is subsidizing production. The reality is that China is outcompeting capitalist Europe (now sacrificed by the US) on capitalist terms. This move seems like an abandonment of free market laissez faire thinking in favour of mercantilism/outright iron curtain, while blaming it on the other guy.

        • 0x815 ( 0x815@feddit.de ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 years ago

          @spacedout

          Well, yeah, it’s complicated and all that, but still. For instance, did you know Huawei is a cooperative? I just learned.

          Everything depends on the central government in China, whether it is a cooperative, a listed company, or a single person critical of the CCP. In tbe end, nothing happens without a highly centralized government.

          • spacedout ( spacedout@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            I think it’s hard to tell and would advise against bombastic blanket statements like this, especially on China. We’re talking about one billion people and the world’s largest economy, after all. Our ability to clearly analyze China is hindered by its own opaqueness, but one should not forget the thick layer of propaganda we in the West are served whenever we’re talking about one of the so-called strategic adversaries.

              • spacedout ( spacedout@lemmy.ml ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 years ago

                There you go again making blanket statements, giving you a look of either being a little daft and unnuanced or some kind of propagandist. “Nothing good”, unless you count biggest lift of people from poverty in history. Imagine two people being born in the sixties in India and China respectively. Both are dirt poor back then. Today one will still be poor, still in a third world country, while the other drives EVs, get their power from worlds largest green energy infrastructure, has working public services, best train system, etc.

                • crispy_kilt ( crispy_kilt@feddit.de ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  Imagine two people being born in the sixties in India and China respectively.

                  I will happily imagine. Will you?

                  China: 55 million dead.

                  India: not.

                  Please note that the 55 million estimate is from a CCP party school official, not from a western historian - thus we can safely conclude that the number may well be higher.

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine

                  And I say this as someone as far left as left goes. We must not be blind to the crimes that have been committed, and are being committed, by terrible dictatorships that hide behind the ideas of Marx.

                  China is a state capitalist dictatorship engaged in genocide as we speak. Whether or not they have the audacity to call themselves socialist, or even communist, does not change their crimes.

    • Guy Ingonito ( kandoh@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 years ago

      Sorry, haven’t almost all our European industries relied heavily on government subsidies

      Yes, and that stuff is factored in on every trade agreement the EU signs. The Chinese subsidies were not so now they are making the adjustments.

      • spacedout ( spacedout@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Trade agreements inside the European single market? What are you on about, buddy? Seems like lazy apologetics. Of course there are state aid rules in the EU, but the fact of the matter is that everyone from Hugo Boss to Seat and Nokia has been on the receiving end of favorable conditions from their home countries (Nazi uniform contracts in Boss’ case). Hell, even the American giants like Microsoft and Apple are propped up on government contracts.

      • spacedout ( spacedout@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        Honestly, when it comes to helping their national companies get ahead in the global market, European countries aren’t that different from anywhere else. It’s like a global game where everyone’s trying to sneak their products into the lead with a little help from home. Think of it as governments giving their players the best gear, secret strategies, and even a map of shortcuts. Whether it’s subsidies, regulatory loopholes, or strategic support, the end goal is the same: make sure our team wins, even if it means bending the rules of fair play. So next time you see a European car or product leading the pack, remember, it might have had a little “help” getting there.