- マリウス ( @mrus@lemmy.sdf.org ) 17•7 months ago
I found LocalSend to be significantly more reliable than Snapdrop. Also it doesn’t require hosting.
- vort3 ( @vort3@lemmy.ml ) 2•7 months ago
But can you use it to send to a device where you can’t install stuff?
- マリウス ( @mrus@lemmy.sdf.org ) 3•7 months ago
Where would that be?
- vort3 ( @vort3@lemmy.ml ) 1•7 months ago
If you want to send something to a computer in school or a work PC or something without admin rights.
snapdrop / sharedrop work in browser, without any installation, and that’s the point. As much as I hate web apps, sometimes they are your only option.
I agree that localsend is great when you need to exchange files between your devices often, but when you quickly need to send a file to someone’s PC without admin rights, snapdrop and sharedrop are a faster way to achieve that.
- Bloody Harry ( @harry315@feddit.de ) 4•7 months ago
Oh, snapdrop is back? The site has been unreachable for years to me
- Unbeelievable ( @Unbeelievable@beehaw.org ) 5•7 months ago
It’s been so unreliable. I switched to PairDrop.net, a fork that works just as well and has better uptime.
- istanbullu ( @istanbullu@lemmy.ml ) 1•7 months ago
I currently use KDE Connect. Is it similar?
- Dymonika ( @Dymonika@beehaw.org ) 1•7 months ago
What is the filesize limit? Is it better than Mozilla’s list of Send instances or ToffeeShare?
- sorter_plainview ( @sorter_plainview@lemmy.today ) 2•7 months ago
There is no limit implemented, but it constantly failed to get an 8gb file to be transferred between two VMs. LocalSend is more reliable in my case.
- ErwinLottemann ( @ErwinLottemann@feddit.de ) 1•7 months ago
i think there is no limit (at least on the software side), because it’s local network only, so nothing is uploaded to a server but directly to the recipient. i could be wrong though.