Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Type 1 [Missouri] ( Type1@midwest.social )  to United States | News & Politics@midwest.socialEnglish · 3 years ago

Supreme Court will weigh banning homeless people from sleeping outside

apnews.com

external-link
message-square
17
link
fedilink
110
external-link

Supreme Court will weigh banning homeless people from sleeping outside

apnews.com

Type 1 [Missouri] ( Type1@midwest.social )  to United States | News & Politics@midwest.socialEnglish · 3 years ago
message-square
17
link
fedilink
With homelessness on the rise, the Supreme Court weighs bans on sleeping outdoors
apnews.com
external-link
The case is considered the most significant to come before the high court in decades on homelessness, which is reaching record levels in the United States.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • ringwraithfish ( ringwraithfish@startrek.website ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    3 years ago

    Can’t afford a home, probably gonna be illegal to be homeless. Guess they should just kill themselves then.

    Fuck the modern conservative movement. No empathy for the downtrodden.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin ( 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 years ago

      The next step is blending them into a nutrient-rich slush that will be fed to people in workhouses

    • tearsintherain ( tearsintherain@leminal.space ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t think this is just about conservatives, it’s also about the owner class and their quality of life. But def significant overlap.

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/16/us-homeless-encampments-companies-profiting-sweeps

      Revealed: how companies made $100m clearing California homeless camps Public spending on private sweep contractors is soaring across the state – and unhoused people allege poor treatment

      This reminds of the gross, despicable private detention and private prison industry in America.

      • melpomenesclevage ( melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee ) BannedBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        these ghouls need to see some consequences. fucking libs.

  • Banzai51 ( Banzai51@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 years ago

    As if we don’t know how this Court will decide.

    • Fapper_McFapper ( Fapper_McFapper@lemm.ee ) deleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      deleted by creator

  • Hyperreality ( Hyperreality@kbin.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 years ago

    Sounds like a great idea.

    Of course, if it’s a crime to be homeless, it’s also a crime to force or coerce someone into commiting that crime.

    I look forward to the officials and landlords responsible to be jailed for each crime they helped commit.

    • altasshet ( altasshet@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      “No, not like that!”

  • Bluefalcon ( Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    That’s right homeless, you can’t sleep here. Just go home already.

  • LoamImprovement ( LoamImprovement@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 years ago

    How’s that old quote go again? “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.”

  • Atelopus-zeteki ( Atelopus-zeteki@kbin.run ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 years ago

    “Let them sleep inside”. paraphrasing Marie Antoinette. smh.

  • penquin ( penquin@lemm.ee ) deleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 years ago

    So, they won’t help them and won’t let them be on the streets? Man, homeless folks need to learn to levitate then, so they can sleep in the air instead.

  • DaSaw ( DaSaw@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    This seems like a no-brainer to me… though it probably isn’t. Obviously you have a constitutional right to sleep, wherever you can make space for yourself. If these cities and downs don’t want people sleeping outside, they need to provide indoor space for people who haven’t actually committed crimes. We treat our criminals better than we treat our homeless.

    • melpomenesclevage ( melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee ) BannedBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      fuck their laws, I think, is the ruling here. just fuck them completely. we do not have a society. your conscience is the only guide.

  • anachronist ( anachronist@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 years ago

    This is probably the most prescient episode of Star Trek ever: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Past_Tense_(Star_Trek%3A_Deep_Space_Nine)

    Basically Sisko and friends go back in time to America in 2024, where it’s illegal to be homeless and they get put in an open air prison.

  • Buelldozer ( Buelldozer@lemmy.today ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s not “sleeping outdoors” that is at issue here, it’s the long term encampments in public spaces and how to deal with them.

    • galoisghost ( galoisghost@aussie.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 years ago

      Given these people have nowhere to go why not set aside some public land that allows long term encampments or maybe if it’s a concern about the safety of these encampments, the government could acquire an empty office building and retrofit it with modest accommodations for these peoples.

      Or you could just admit it’s not about helping these people it’s about making them go away.

      • Buelldozer ( Buelldozer@lemmy.today ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Those are both reasonable solutions and I’m not arguing against them. I just pointed out that this fight isn’t about banning homeless people from sleeping outside. It’s more nuanced than that.

United States | News & Politics@midwest.social

usa@midwest.social

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !usa@midwest.social

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules:

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they’re US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

No NYPost, Breitbart, Daily Mail, Daily Wire

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 130 users / day
  • 683 users / week
  • 1.24K users / month
  • 3.04K users / 6 months
  • 129 local subscribers
  • 4.42K subscribers
  • 11.3K Posts
  • 17.5K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • exposingfash ( exposingfash@midwest.social ) 
  • cm0002 ( cm0002@infosec.pub ) 
  • cm0002 ( cm0002@lemy.lol ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code