How Abrupt U-Turns Are Defining U.S. Environmental Regulations

www.nytimes.com

cross-posted to:
nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

How Abrupt U-Turns Are Defining U.S. Environmental Regulations

www.nytimes.com

silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to

Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

cross-posted to:
nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz

The polarization of politics means that rules are imposed, gutted and restored with each election. Experts say that’s bad for the economy.

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

121 users / day
846 users / week
1.43K users / month
3.75K users / 6 months
172 local subscribers
9.08K subscribers
13.2K Posts
22.1K Comments
Modlog

mods:
silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net )