- cross-posted to:
- googlepixel@lemdro.id
cross-posted from: https://reddthat.com/post/20003770
Tensor G4 of Google Pixel 9 shows only a slight performance bump on leaked benchmarks
aleph ( @aleph@lemm.ee ) English33•27 days agoMeh, who cares about performance benchmarks for phones?
I’m much more interested to see how power efficient Tensor 4 is, and whether or not they’ve fixed the connectivity issues.
Performance matters. The tensor chipsets throttle heavily because they have bad thermals and they cannot sustain their performance after just 3 minutes of mild to heavy use. After 10 minutes they perform worse than midrange snapdragon processors. It would be different if pixels were cheap. But, unfortunately they are not. Making this alongside connectivity issues a sore point for pixels.
Avid Amoeba ( @avidamoeba@lemmy.ca ) English2•26 days agoThe thermals between the different Tensors are not the same. The G3 is made on a smaller manufacturing node and it’s significantly more power efficient in daily use.
The a-series are priced at the mid range and they also use the same chipsets as the more expensive Pixels.
When I was talking about thermals I was primarily speaking about the tensor G3. The previous generations are way worse.
As for A series being priced midrange. In my country it costs Rs52999($635) for the base 8/128gb model. I can get the top 16/256gb variant of the oneplus 12R with the much superior Snapdragon 8 gen 2 for Rs45999($551). There are also other options like the Poco X6 pro, motorola edge 50 pro, and the Realme GT 6T which cost significantly less.
Unless, pixels start approaching the price point of other smartphones. Its a no go to pay the google price just for software and camera alone.
Avid Amoeba ( @avidamoeba@lemmy.ca ) English3•26 days agoWell in that case the Pixels are simply overpriced there and there’s definitely more hardware to be had in the ones you mentioned.
On a separate note, the Snapdragon based devices simply don’t compare in security update support. That’s the primary reason I’ve been putting up with the first gen Tensor. All of the first gen Pixels in use will be secure till the end of 2026. And the 8/8a series till 2030/31.
Samsung s24 series promise 7 years of OS and security updates just the same as pixel 8 smartphones. Fairphone also promises up to 8 years of security updates and at least 5 os updates until 2031.
Samsung uses a mix of snapdragon and exynos. Fairphone uses an usual but enterprise grade midrange snapdragon processor. So, 7 years of updates do happen with snapdragon. Just depends on the manufacturer and the contract they have with Qualcomm.
Avid Amoeba ( @avidamoeba@lemmy.ca ) English3•26 days agoThis is new development with Qualcomm’s chipsets and they’ve historically been extremely reluctant to sign contracts for long update support so I’m skeptical till proven otherwise. They’ve always been a super profit maximizing company and they’ve typically been the king of the hill for Android and still are for modems, so they have all the incentives to not sign such agreements or not honor them. We don’t know how strong these are. I’d be super happy to be proven wrong. I’ve worked (and still do) on the embedded side with devices built on QC chipsets and Qualcomm behave today as they did a decade ago.
aleph ( @aleph@lemm.ee ) English2•26 days agoRight, but these new benchmarks don’t speak to that, do they?
It’s a minor improvement at best. The thermal performance should be similar if not the same.
fuckwit_mcbumcrumble ( @fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English5•27 days agoPerformance and battery life are deeply connected. Race to idle is how almost everything is designed around.
jcarax ( @jcarax@beehaw.org ) English5•26 days agoI’m pretty sure they’re just treading water this year, and focusing on their in-house design for the Tensor G5 in 2025. Hopefully it doesn’t break Graphene support.
aleph ( @aleph@lemm.ee ) English3•26 days agoI though G4 was supposed to bring a big improvement to the modem, or is that going to be G5?
Auli ( @Auli@lemmy.ca ) English2•26 days agoI’ll tell you a secret it well always be the next one. Has been that way forever with Google hardware. Don’t know why people still think they well do something magical at this point.
aleph ( @aleph@lemm.ee ) English1•26 days agoPossibly, lol. Although going from Samsung’s to their own completely custom silicon will be the best chance of seeing some actual improvements.
jcarax ( @jcarax@beehaw.org ) English1•26 days agoIt’s sounding like an upgrade from Exynos 5300 to 5400, so I’m not expecting much.
burgersc12 ( @burgersc12@mander.xyz ) English11•27 days agoHow is the camera bump getting worse???
GingeyBook ( @GingeyBook@lemm.ee ) English3•26 days agoLooks miles better to me
burgersc12 ( @burgersc12@mander.xyz ) English5•26 days agoIdk Pixel 6 feels like the most iconic version so far, really sad seeing what direction they’ve taken it
Ilandar ( @Ilandar@aussie.zone ) English3•26 days agoAgreed. The Pixel line had a really distinctive design language with the 6 but they’ve moved further away from that with each release since.
GingeyBook ( @GingeyBook@lemm.ee ) English2•26 days agoStill using my 6 Pro, the back glass is scratched to hell and back and covered in smudges
Yes, I know I can take better care of it, but at the end of the day, glass is glass
The previous ones were so much better.
figaro ( @figaro@lemdro.id ) English3•25 days agoArguably, the average person will not care. My mom will probably buy one because, and I quote, “Your phone takes good pictures!”
Benchmark tests don’t matter to normal people