- cross-posted to:
- europe@feddit.de
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- CyberMonkey404 ( @CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml ) 103•3 months ago
Because of course they do, the filth
- CosmicTurtle0 ( @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English71•3 months ago
They obviously look at child porn. If they had nothing to hide, they would volunteer!
I say it’s time to investigate each politicians phones and computers and then install monitoring software.
For the children.
- CyberMonkey404 ( @CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml ) 16•3 months ago
Finally an initiative I can get behind
- GolfNovemberUniform ( @GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml ) 45•3 months ago
But that requires the apps to be able to identify if the user is in the “privileged group” or not so even more tracking now? We definitely have to stop it.
- sunzu ( @sunzu@kbin.run ) 18•3 months ago
It doesn’t have to.
They will just get the Foss version while the law requires wage slaves to get daddy approved version OR else!
How to contact your MEP. We beat this bill last time, we can beat it again https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home
- kingthrillgore ( @KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml ) 20•3 months ago
True conservatism is about one thing and one thing only:
- Uriel238 [all pronouns] ( @uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English7•3 months ago
Here in the states, a lot of the Republican party campaigns as Reagan and [George H. W.] Bush conservatives or OG conservatives, and I have to remind them that those conservatives and MAGAs (Christian nationalists, white power) are the exact same thing.
The policies of Reagan accelerated our path to the precipice of one-party autocracy. What they pushed as policy then figures largely in how we got here, with the last vestiges of US democracy tilting off the precipice into one-party autocracy.
Old fiscal responsibility / family values Republicans just wished they had another mile or two to plummet and the cold rocks below weren’t looming so close.
To toss in another metaphor, they didn’t just buy a ticket to ride, they used their railroad shares to vote on where to lay the rails, and where the line ends.
- PowerCrazy ( @PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml ) English5•3 months ago
It may not need to wear a red shirt, nor a blue shirt… If you hear fascism is on the rise and you think “Maga” you are naive.
- Crikeste ( @Crikeste@lemm.ee ) 2•3 months ago
You only need the first A for the fascism qualification.
- Queen HawlSera ( @HawlSera@lemm.ee ) English2•3 months ago
I’m in North Carolina, since Obama’s second term we’ve been getting redder and redder, and it’s kinda bumming me out.
- utopiah ( @utopiah@lemmy.ml ) 18•3 months ago
Obviously important but “Published 2 months ago, on April 15, 2024” so would be good to also have an up to date link to understand what has changed, if anything, since that leak.
- Unskilled5117 ( @Unskilled5117@feddit.de ) 25•3 months ago
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/csam_cleaned.pdf
Leaked updated proposal (14.06.2024)
(12a) In the light of the more limited risk of their use for the purpose of child sexual abuse and the need to preserve confidential information, including classified information, information covered by professional secrecy and trade secrets, electronic communications services that are not publicly available, such as those used for national security purposes, should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation. Accordingly, this Regulation should not apply to interpersonal communications services that are not available to the general public and the use of which is instead restricted to persons involved in the activities of a particular company, organisation, body or authority.
= it has stayed the same. They still want to exempt themselves
- chicken ( @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 2•3 months ago
more limited risk
Doubt
- digdilem ( @digdilem@lemmy.ml ) 16•3 months ago
That’s great optics.
Not sure how workable it is to define how you would define “confidential information” without having already viewed the content. But the whole thing isn’t very clever on a technical level anyway. Technically competent people will always find a way around such censorship.
- infeeeee ( @infeeeee@lemm.ee ) 15•3 months ago
- Sneezycat ( @sneezycat@sopuli.xyz ) 5•3 months ago
Rules for thee…
- WasPentalive ( @waspentalive@lemmy.one ) English2•3 months ago
Spying for thee but not for me. Be seeing you.
- Uriel238 [all pronouns] ( @uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English1•3 months ago
Saved. Thank you.
There are too many instances of classical-age commenters dealing with the same exact bullshit we deal with now.
It doesn’t speak well to our capacity to learn and improve.
- Steal Wool ( @h3mlocke@lemm.ee ) English11•3 months ago
Of course they do.
- Queen HawlSera ( @HawlSera@lemm.ee ) English11•3 months ago
The second parliament wants themselves to be the sole exception from a law they wanna pass, that law should be scrapped.
- BigMacHole ( @BigMacHole@lemm.ee ) 9•3 months ago
That’s because this is such a GOOD and LEGAL measure! They ONLY exempt themselves from the BEST and FAIREST measures!