This article reads like AI wrote it. It repeats itself very early on the nature of offences, then it reads like the introduction to actual journalism before stopping cold.
I’ve been saying this for a while now, but AI articles read like bad high school essays. “State your thesis. Write a paragraph that echos your thesis. Say something that may or may not be related to your thesis. Finish by repeating your thesis.”
There are probably enough school essays in most AI training sets to represent a measurable percentage. (Although there is probably a much larger percentage of pornographic fan fiction with subliterate spelling and grammar, so maybe we should be glad that we’re only getting bad high school essays.)
I suppose that is what happens when it is trained on bad HS essays.
Thsts how good articles are written by humans, though. Books too. Emails too
People should be able to speed read your content without missing the most important points, because its reiterated and stated in s few different ways
Yeah, same thought here. Even more revealing (damning?) Is the fact that it was written by ‘staff.’
I see this style more and more, and they always serm to be written by generic ‘staff.’
Staff is the name of their ChatGPT account.
How some
federalemployees are pretending to work using ‘mouse jigglers’.FTFY.
This happens everywhere that managers are more interested in warming chairs than actually being productive:
- If you measure your employees by their work done, this isn’t an issue; if they’re getting what you think should be eight hours of work done in four, you promote them, pay them more and/or give them more responsibilities.
- If you measure them by the percentage of hours they spend warming a chair, they’ll…warm the chair.
Yeah, so maybe the public service needs to take a look at say “if we have two people warming a chair for 60% of their work time, maybe we should fire two and have the third only warming the chair 10% of the time”
I usually just run Qubes, so none of that boss spyware would work anyway