some_guy ( @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ) 14•5 days agoWhen your political party has to ban thought there ought to be some questions as to why you support said party.
Che Banana ( @The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org ) 3•5 days agobecause they think it doesn’t hurt them as much as it hurts others…
doctortofu ( @doctortofu@reddthat.com ) 4•5 days agoCan’t let kids know about sex until they’re old enough for catholic priests and MAGA republicans to lose interest in them - will someone think of the child
rendiddlers!?Disgusting, and a that librarian says in the article - it is only going to get worse…
ssm ( @ssm@lemmy.sdf.org ) 3•5 days agoVery well, we will give proper education outside of the schools.
Thorny_Insight ( @Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee ) 1•5 days agoThese articles never seem to include excerpts from said books. This is not sex-ed books they’re banning. There’s quite graphic depictions of acts of sex in these. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to not want literal children to read that kind of stuff.
If a highschool student cannot be instructed on Shakespeare without it being a crime, the law is too far gone to be reasonable in anyway. The same goes for Brave New World and A Handmaid’s Tale. There are graphic depictions of sex in many major works of literature and we need to quit pretending teenagers don’t know what sex is or that reading about it will indelibly harm them.