- sexy_peach ( @sexy_peach@beehaw.org ) English38•2 months ago
sounds nice, I’ll believe it when I see it
- BlemboTheThird ( @BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca ) 23•2 months ago
yeah i mean, theres no way lol. even if the tech gets here that quickly there’s 0% chance prices come down significantly on lower capacity drives. these’ll be at least $500 and possibly far far more
- pop ( @pop@lemmy.ml ) 21•2 months ago
20 TB at that price range could brankrupt some small cloud providers. Selfhosting would be much easier without having to worry about space. IF the price stays the same, but we’ll see.
- 4am ( @4am@lemm.ee ) 8•2 months ago
I’d be interested what the wear-leveling and write-cycles look like. $250 for 20TB is half the current price of decent spinning rust, but if they’ll die in a year because they’re part of a Ceph cluster or ZFS array, that’s gonna be a no from me, dawg.
- TheFrenchGhosty ( @TheFrenchGhosty@lemmy.pussthecat.org ) 1•2 months ago
$250 for 20TB is half the current price of decent spinning rust
No? Like, not at all.
- 4am ( @4am@lemm.ee ) 3•2 months ago
WD Red Pro 20TB = $420 MSRP, $380 cheapest I’ve found. Not considering taxes/shipping in that
So, you’re splitting hairs by saying that’s not half. Point stands
- TheFrenchGhosty ( @TheFrenchGhosty@lemmy.pussthecat.org ) 2•2 months ago
16-18 TB HDD have been at that price for like 5 years, it doesn’t mean most people buy them
- GenderNeutralBro ( @GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org ) English16•2 months ago
Do I need a 20TB boot drive? No. Do I want it enough to pay $250? Yes, absolutely. I’m running 1TB now and I need to manage my space far more often than I’d like, despite the fact that I keep my multimedia on external mass storage. Also, sometimes the performance of that external HD really is a hindrance. I’d love to just have (almost) everything on my primary volume and never worry about it.
It’s kind of weird how I have less internal storage today than I did 15 years ago. I mean, it’s like 50 times faster, but still.
I’m not super-skeptical about the pricing. This stuff can’t stay expensive forever, and 2027 is still a ways off.
- casmael ( @casmael@lemm.ee ) 7•2 months ago
So is that enough for the modern warfare installer or
- Estebiu ( @Estebiu@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 3•2 months ago
Maybe I should put off building a NAS for the time being.
- Ioughttamow ( @Ioughttamow@kbin.run ) 4•2 months ago
Yeah…. I think I’ll still need to pick up some drives this year, but I might do less robust of a build out
- InputZero ( @InputZero@lemmy.ml ) 2•2 months ago
I’ve switched over to one disk redundancy to stretch out my spinning rust. If SSDs come down just a little bit more it’ll be worth it to replace my array. Just hoping two drives doesn’t die until then.
- RobotToaster ( @RobotToaster@mander.xyz ) 2•2 months ago
Generally the more layers you add to an SSD the less robust it is. If this is real your data will be corrupt within a week.
- veroxii ( @veroxii@aussie.zone ) 4•2 months ago
I mean you can say the same for spinning magnetic platters. “The more bits you’re trying to squeeze into a fixed size HDD the less robust it is.”
I’m not saying these guys can do it, but dismissing higher densities of storage out of hand seems a bit glib considering the last 60 years of progress and innovation.
- fmstrat ( @fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com ) English3•2 months ago
They’re a flat-storager.
- pbjamm ( @pbjamm@beehaw.org ) English3•2 months ago
Should work perfectly with Flatpack apps then!
- RobotToaster ( @RobotToaster@mander.xyz ) 1•2 months ago
That’s never really been an issue with HDDs as far as I’m aware, although 10k rpm drives were known to be more fragile IIRC. The lower life and robustness of QLC vs SLC flash is well known.
- ShortN0te ( @ShortN0te@lemmy.ml ) 3•2 months ago
That is exactly what ppl like you said when SLC came out and TLC came out and QLC came out…
Look back now.
- adr1an ( @anzo@programming.dev ) 1•2 months ago
And they use far more energy. Meanwhile spinning disks can sit idle with all of my hoarded data.
- adr1an ( @anzo@programming.dev ) 1•2 months ago
AFAIK power consumption increases with size on SSDs. And that’s not the case with spinning disks. That’s what I tried to point out, from the perspective of hoarding data (idle disks) bigger sizes are not something to be pursued. Then of course there’s the use case of needing a high volume fast storage (e.g. zfs cache), for which use case these are great!