- cross-posted to:
- news@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
- firefox@lemmy.ml
- browsers@lemmy.ml
Google Chrome is now encouraging uBlock Origin users who have updated to the latest version to switch to other ad blockers before Manifest v2 extensions are disabled.
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English6•2 months ago
Firefox and Librewolf have problems. However, they are somehow better than Chrome.
- melroy ( @melroy@kbin.melroy.org ) 1•2 months ago
Don’t forget other alternatives as well like Floorp and Waterfox.
- Possibly linux ( @possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip ) English1•2 months ago
Not as private and Floorp includes proprietary components. I am not sure about waterfox.
- Onihikage ( @Onihikage@beehaw.org ) English2•2 months ago
Floorp includes proprietary components
That’s out of date, they made everything open-source again recently as announced on their subreddit.
- melroy ( @melroy@kbin.melroy.org ) 1•1 month ago
That is not true indeed. As Onihikage pointed out the developer released all source code.
- cmnybo ( @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de ) English4•2 months ago
Luckily the one webapp that I have to use chrome for doesn’t even have ads or tracking on it. I use Firefox for everything else, so uBlock will continue working fine for me.
- 50MYT ( @50MYT@aussie.zone ) English3•2 months ago
I have a hypothetical question on this.
If say, I had a crypto wallet via extension in chrome.
And unlock origin goes away.
I then visit a site I used to visit where pop ups were blocked
Malware gets installed. Crypto wallet gets drained.
Can I sue Google ?
I ask because I do have a tiny wallet that is via extension. Curious how someone with a much larger one on there would go…
Terms of service you agreed to when installing it protects them from all liability.
- 50MYT ( @50MYT@aussie.zone ) English2•2 months ago
While I agree.
Part of me thinks it’s like “we removed the seatbelts from the rollercoaster. It’s now your responsibility to hold on”…
That’s why laws that mandate safety are important. Seatbelts on rollercoasters are mandatory, while tech companies can pretty much put anything in terms of service since they have enough of the politicians in their pocket that nobody outlaws it.
- LunchMoneyThief ( @LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org ) English2•2 months ago
Excellent news. Google needs to think up more creative ways to punish people for using Chrome.