• poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 years ago

    If the insurance company is really on the hook for 420 million, there are probably some interesting discussion going on right now about a cheaper robotic repair mission or so.

    • zhunk ( zhunk@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      A crewed mission won’t happen because of cost and physics reasons, but it would be cool to see a Falcon Heavy launch a stripped down Dragon with two crew and a kick stage for a GEO servicing mission.

    • upstream ( upstream@beehaw.org ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Considering it costs $67 million just to launch a reusable falcon 9 they’d have to be 100% sure of the outcome to bet on such a thing.

      If not you’re $100+ mill out and still have to replace a €420 million satellite…

      • zhunk ( zhunk@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think you’re right that a dedicated Falcon launch would be needed for getting something like a Northrop’s MEV out there, but if the spacecraft was “only” a smallsat with a few commercial arms on board, that might fit on a SpaceX rideshare for a lot less money.