According to a Wall Street Journal report, banks that loaned Elon Musk $13 billion to buy Twitter haven’t been able to sell the debt.

    • Darkassassin07 ( Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s not money they owe, but money owed to them; backed by some form of contract. Your credit card contract for example.

      Person A owes person B money, let’s say $100. Person B sells that debt to Person C for $80.

      Person A still owes the same $100, just to a different person.

      Person B gets paid now instead of waiting for Person A to pay up, but lost $20 on the deal.

      Person C invested $80, hopefully gets paid the full $100, not having to chase down a delinquent debtor, and profits $20 out of the deal.

      Nobody wants to be person C when it comes to the Debt Twitter owes.

      If you had someone that owed you money (or anything else really), you could sell that debt, assuming you can find a buyer for it. Banks just do this on a much larger scale than $100 at a time.

  • taanegl ( taanegl@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    Might be? This is the worst investment they ever made, and they know it, mostly because they’ve speaking publicly like this, because usually they bury the lead - to protect their other investments.

    International financiers are really the worst.