- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.zip
You must log in or register to comment.
- teawrecks ( @teawrecks@sopuli.xyz ) 12•7 days ago
The existence of this article is confusing to me. FB doesn’t need to “scrape” their own site, and they don’t care about whether you set your photos to public or private.
- Fixbeat ( @Fixbeat@lemmy.ml ) 10•7 days ago
Training for what exactly?
- Dymonika ( @Dymonika@beehaw.org ) 6•7 days ago
Why, it’s so they can detect fake, AI-generated faces, of course!
- Barry Zuckerkorn ( @BarryZuckerkorn@beehaw.org ) 7•7 days ago
Isn’t the opt-out option to just not make the photos/posts globally public?
- Deceptichum ( @Deceptichum@quokk.au ) English8•7 days ago
? They own the data. They don’t need it to be public to access it.
- Barry Zuckerkorn ( @BarryZuckerkorn@beehaw.org ) 5•7 days ago
Yes but they only performed the training on the posts and images set to be globally publicly accessible by anyone. In a sense, they took the public permissions as an indicator that they could use that data for more than just providing the bare social media service.