Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Hugohase ( Hugohase@startrek.website )  to Green Energy@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago

Sweden switches on largest battery energy storage system in the Nordics - Energy Storage

www.ess-news.com

external-link
message-square
12
link
fedilink
39
external-link

Sweden switches on largest battery energy storage system in the Nordics - Energy Storage

www.ess-news.com

Hugohase ( Hugohase@startrek.website )  to Green Energy@slrpnk.net · 2 years ago
message-square
12
link
fedilink
Sweden's largest energy storage investment, totaling 211 MW, goes live, combining 14 sites.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Hugohase ( Hugohase@startrek.website ) OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    This looks exactly like I always imagined battery storage should look like, at least in a first step. Mid-sized batteries strategically distributed in the grid for frequency regulation/grid balancing.

  • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr) ( lnxtx@feddit.nl ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hate mixing W with Wh.

    Is it 211 MWh battery storage with maximum power output (peak, average, etc.) of 211 MW?

    • MrMakabar ( MrMakabar@slrpnk.net ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      It very much looks like it is 211MW lasting for 1h giving 211MWh.

    • Mihies ( Mihies@programming.dev ) Banned from community
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It literally says in first paragraph “…in Sweden to deploy 211 MW / 211 MWh…”

      • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr) ( lnxtx@feddit.nl ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        = 1 h

        It’s not a strictly technical megazine. That’s why I have doubts.

        • Mihies ( Mihies@programming.dev ) Banned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Ha, right. Seems that distinguishing between power and energy is really a hard task (for journalists).

    • Tobberone ( Tobberone@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There is usually a 1:1 between MW:MWh at these capacities.

  • Mihies ( Mihies@programming.dev ) Banned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Removed by mod

    • AlsaValderaan ( AlsaValderaan@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      I found this on it; still need to read through it. Some sort of lithium battery technology, it seems.

      • Hirom ( Hirom@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Li-Ion seems to be the go-to solution. I hope new static energy storage projects will prefer other options (Na-Ion, flow batteries, …) since there’s a limited supply of Lithium and we need it for vehicles.

        • Mihies ( Mihies@programming.dev ) Banned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, I was hoping for other less toxic and more nature friendly ones, too.

        • Tobberone ( Tobberone@lemm.ee ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s the only chemistry possible to source unfortunately. I read about other chemistries, but they are hard to find.

      • houseofleft ( houseofleft@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t know specifics on this battery farm, but almost all are essentially fleets of shipping containers filled with smaller batteries, rather than some super-cool-mega-battery, so it’s probably a safe assumption that this is a landmark project in scale, rather than in technology specifics.

Green Energy@slrpnk.net

energy@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !energy@slrpnk.net

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

  • Electric Vehicles
  • Offgrid living
  • Hydrogen@fedia.io
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 6 users / day
  • 221 users / week
  • 642 users / month
  • 2.34K users / 6 months
  • 97 local subscribers
  • 4.63K subscribers
  • 1.99K Posts
  • 4.18K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • poVoq ( poVoq@slrpnk.net ) 
  • Steve ( SteveKLord@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code