Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
TheImpressiveX ( TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml )  to [moved to piefed] movies@lemm.eeEnglish · 2 years ago

‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ to Lose $150 Million to $200 Million in Theatrical Run After Bombing at Box Office

variety.com

external-link
message-square
15
link
fedilink
62
external-link

‘Joker: Folie à Deux’ to Lose $150 Million to $200 Million in Theatrical Run After Bombing at Box Office

variety.com

TheImpressiveX ( TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml )  to [moved to piefed] movies@lemm.eeEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
15
link
fedilink
"Joker: Folie a Deux" was positioned as a box office smash but is now poised to lose $150 million to $200 million in its theatrical run.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • JizzmasterD ( JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    It was actually not bad. It stumbled on the ending but did a lot of things well for the DC universe’s « La La Land. »

  • Blaze (he/him) ( Blaze@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Imagine making 20 millions as a director to lose 200

  • doggle ( doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Didn’t even know this movie had been announced until I’d heard it was bombing. I never watched the first one so odds were pretty slim I’d have seen it anyway.

  • rothaine ( rothaine@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    roughly $100 million to market and distribute.

    And yet this is the first time I’m hearing that it’s out

    • TheImpressiveX ( TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s because you use uBlock Origin and don’t subscribe to cable.

      Plus, you’re on the Fediverse, where there are even less opportunities for advertising than centralized social media.

      • Blaze (he/him) ( Blaze@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s still regularly discussed on this community

        • TheImpressiveX ( TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml ) OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          True. Maybe @rothaine@beehaw.org isn’t a regular member of this community.

  • RidderSport ( RidderSport@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I did watch it, although I had been warned. I figured the calls of it being a musical had to be inflated - they weren’t. If you cut the singing, you’ll have about half the runtime.

    That in and of itself isn’t even bad, albeit not my cup of tea. However what really annoyed me, was that NOTHING happened. It was basically a slice of psychic ward life story. One with an explosive but blue-balled ending. It was basically just the script writers trying to make Lady Gaga sing a lot - well a job well done I suppose.

    It actually annoys me a lot, because the cast was great and delivered exceptionally well in their acting. The premise and setting also had a lot of potential, but what we got was more of an art-house low-budget movie with great actors but terrible script

    • smeenz ( smeenz@lemmy.nz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      A psychic ward? Now that would make for an interesting story. Joker can now see into the future.

  • Gamma ( GammaGames@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just don’t understand. The first was a novelty that did surprisingly well, I had no expectation that this would be anywhere as successful. Who’s making these estimates?

    • DragonTypeWyvern ( DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Removed by mod

      • Gamma ( GammaGames@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Compared to most movies… it was weird. I enjoyed my time with it but didn’t care what happened after the credits rolled. I don’t know anyone that was looking forward to this, most didn’t even know about it.

        At least the first one had the stairs meme!

        • DarkThoughts ( DarkThoughts@fedia.io ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I loved the first one. The second one I immediately did not care about the moment I heard that it was a musical. At first I thought they were joking.

          • Gamma ( GammaGames@beehaw.org ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Don’t get me wrong, the first was a good movie! It was also what I expected going in: a slow character piece about some guy turning into a crazy Batman villain.

            I didn’t know the sequel was a musical, what an odd decision!

  • HeartyOfGlass ( HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    That’s okay. In a year or two they’ll call it a “cult classic” and make another anyway.

    • AlexisFR ( AlexisFR@jlai.lu ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, they won’t. It’ll never be a cult classic.

[moved to piefed] movies@lemm.ee

movies@lemm.ee

Subscribe from Remote Instance

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !movies@lemm.ee
lock
Community locked: only moderators can create posts. You can still comment on posts.

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have “English” selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

  • Discussion threads to discuss about a specific movie or show
  • Weekly threads: what have you been watching lately?
  • Trailers
  • Posters
  • Retrospectives
  • Should I watch?

Related communities:

  • !television@lemm.ee
  • !animation@lemm.ee
  • !homevideo@feddit.uk
  • !horrormovies@lemm.ee
  • !martialartsmovies@lemm.ee

Show communities:

  • !avatar@lemmy.world
  • !dundermifflin@lemm.ee
  • !futurama@lemmy.world
  • !thesimpsons@lemmy.world

Discussion communities:

  • !casualconversation@lemm.ee
  • !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

  • Dune
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 1 user / 6 months
  • 18 local subscribers
  • 4.27K subscribers
  • 2.56K Posts
  • 8.46K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • maegul (he/they) ( maegul@lemmy.ml ) 
  • neidu2 ( neidu2@feddit.nl ) 
  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 ( Emperor@feddit.uk ) 
  • maegul ( maegul@lemm.ee ) 
  • BoozeOrWater ( BoozeOrWater@lemm.ee ) 
  • TheImpressiveX ( TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code