- cross-posted to:
- opensource@lemmy.ml
- lad ( @sukhmel@programming.dev ) English3•12 hours ago
I’m unfamiliar with bitwarden’s licence and skimmed through the issue and my understanding is:
- To use bitwarden API you must use SDK
- To use SDK you are obligated to be the official application, otherwise you violate the licence
- The official application is GPL but since SDK is somehow ‘separate program’ it is considered OK to couple with a more restrictive license
However, our goal is to make sure that the SDK is used in a way that maintains GPL compatibility.
This is something I completely fail to understand other that mental gymnastics to bend the truth enough to not look like they are not quite right
Edit: is my understanding correct? It looks like this is not the first project that becomes ‘source available’ after being FOSS in the past, as of lately
- some_guy ( @some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org ) 3•15 hours ago
Glad I don’t need to rely on this project. Get fucked, Bitwarden.
- Hellfire103 ( @hellfire103@lemmy.ca ) English3•16 hours ago
Ight, imma go back to KeePass
EDIT: Jesus FUCKING Christ! £59.99 for Strongbox Pro‽ I’ve got to get an Android at some point…
- Kissaki ( @Kissaki@programming.dev ) English2•15 hours ago
Being able to build the app as you are trying to do here is an issue we plan to resolve and is merely a bug.