Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

China’s EV Boom Threatens to Push Gasoline Demand Off a Cliff

finance.yahoo.com

external-link
message-square
9
link
fedilink
71
external-link

China’s EV Boom Threatens to Push Gasoline Demand Off a Cliff

finance.yahoo.com

silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
9
link
fedilink
(Bloomberg) -- From Tesla chargers in the ancient alleys that surround the Forbidden City in Beijing to lonely highway rest stops with charging posts in the western deserts, signs of the electrification of China’s transport fleet — and the demise of gasoline — are everywhere.Most Read from BloombergIn Traffic-Weary Toronto, a Battle Breaks Out Over Bike LanesIn Italy’s Motor City, Car-Free Options Are GrowingNew York City’s ‘Living Breakwaters’ Brace for Stormier SeasNow, according to official s
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • Bluefalcon ( Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Won’t someone please think of the oil companies.

  • TheFriar ( TheFriar@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fuckin good

  • humanspiral ( humanspiral@lemmy.ca ) Banned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Removed by mod

    • cestvrai ( cestvrai@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      EVs are heavier, put more wear on the roads (for the same class of vehicle) and more microplastics into the environment from the tires. They don’t fix noise pollution, road safety or congestion.

      We need better public transit, not robotaxis.

      • MrSpArkle ( MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 years ago

        Fuck good, let’s have perfect.

      • AHemlocksLie ( AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        They may not fix noise pollution, but they seem to reduce it. At least at urban speeds where I can be near them when they’re driving, them sure seem to be significantly quieter than gas cars.

      • countrypunk ( countrypunk@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Wait, why are EV tires more polluting than gasoline tires?

        • AHemlocksLie ( AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          Because the car is heavier overall, which means they put more wear on the tires per mile driven.

  • Zink ( Zink@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    On one hand, good. Great!

    On the other hand, I live in the United States of Trumpistan. So many nincompoops here would be happy to drive a smoke-belching pickup truck to their office job while China speeds away from us with all their fancy book-learnin’ technology.

    • millie ( millie@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I thought you were going to say they would be happy to drive their smoke belching pickup trucks off a cliff and became briefly enthusiastic about the idea.

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 166 users / day
  • 391 users / week
  • 1.33K users / month
  • 3.59K users / 6 months
  • 172 local subscribers
  • 9.06K subscribers
  • 13.1K Posts
  • 21.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code