•  Deceptichum   ( @Deceptichum@quokk.au ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Please, no.

    LD was great, it worked well as a genuine love letter to the franchise let’s leave it at that. We don’t need a comedy, or a romance, or a drama, thriller, sitcom, etc. spin-off of Star Trek.

    They’re going to Star Wars-ise Star Trek and kill the franchise the same as Disney is by over-doing it (and Marvel) into the ground.

        • Sure, I’d understand your sentiment more when all those shows were being announced, rather than after they’ve all been canned. Right now we’re looking at ten episodes plus the Section 31 special in the coming year, which doesn’t seem like over doing it to me. But I was raised on seasons of twenty-plus episodes, so maybe I’m spoiled.

    • I have to admit I had very low hopes for Lower Decks after that first teaser featuring a drunk Mariner being reckless with a bat’leth. It looked like it was going to be just another “adult cartoon” cash-in like the dozens on Netflix. Very happy that my initial impression was totally wrong.

      Lower Decks was an effective Star Trek show as well as an effective comedy. While I also wouldn’t trust this idea with just anyone, as long as there are people working on it who understand why Star Trek is important and how the themes are more important than being dismissive, I welcome another comfy optimistic comedy about a better world.

    • The Starwarsification of the franchise began with the reboot films. These new shows aren’t contributing to that, imo. If anything, the Star Wars shows are Startrekifying their cinematic universe, which isn’t such a terrible thing…

  •  meyotch   ( @meyotch@slrpnk.net ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    83 months ago

    I want to see more of the Neo-transcendentalists and their society. I love the bisexual swinger vibes, but I also understand why Andy Billups bugged out and joined starfleet.

    Sometimes you just want to clean a plasma coil without all the drama.

  •  KNova   ( @knova@infosec.pub ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 months ago

    Love this. I don’t agree with the sentiment that Trek is being overdone - I’d rather have a slate of options and sit through the “bad” than have to wait years to get anything close to good.

    Like, I enjoyed parts of Picard, but on the whole, it didn’t work out (maybe given the serial nature of each season, or cramming pretty ambitious ideas into 10 episodes each season). But I’ll take that any day over having to wait a week at a time for a “filler” episode.

    Still hoping for a Klingon focused show… would love anything where a federation vessel isn’t the primary setting!

    •  the_sisko   ( @the_sisko@startrek.website ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I totally agree that I love the variety of options! But I would be very happy if one of the options was that we get filler/bottle episodes for a few weeks per season, but every season is 26 episodes long. They could just spread the budget for 10 episodes across all 26, and make the VFX less… shiny.

      (Of course, I don’t actually want actors to be worked to the bone like they were in the 90s…)

  • As it’s Tawny Newsome, I’m giving it a chance.

    My dream trek show, though, would be a semi-anthology that explores different crews (mostly non-Federation, but maybe one), sort of like if LD:”Wej Duj” was a series. Each crew would have a self-contained 50 minute plot, and then you would have them meet up for a finale (hopefully in two parts) with a meetup of each crew.

    The one episode idea I have would be called something like “Cetacean Ops”, featuring a Starfleet vessel commanded and mostly staffed by aquatic (and some amphibious) life forms, except for main engineering. In addition to exploring what the heck whales do in the Federation, we could explore the dynamics of how non-aquatic and aquatic crew interact and try to prevent loneliness.