WatDabney ( @WatDabney@fedia.io ) 33•2 months agoThey’re explicitly trying to get them killed.
And at some point they’re going to succeed.
DdCno1 ( @DdCno1@beehaw.org ) 7•2 months ago“Will no one rid me of this meddlesome journalist…”
jarfil ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 3•2 months ago“Will no one rid us of these meddlesome billionaires…” 🇫🇷🤔
Pete Hahnloser ( @Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) English26•2 months agoHeaven forbid anyone commit the crime of disagreeing with Dear Leader! You’ll be called out so that you can start getting death threats or someone actually following through. This is madness.
Snot Flickerman ( @SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) English13•2 months agoThe ol constitution probably should have had something about offices other than congress limiting free speech.
hopesdead ( @hopesdead@startrek.website ) 8•2 months agoFirst Amendment Violation?
Where we’re going we don’t need amendments
Pete Hahnloser ( @Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) English8•2 months agoThe existing ones seem to already be meaningless.
HumanPenguin ( @HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ) English2•2 months agoNameing them and criticism is def not a first amendment violation.
Just at the least very irresponsible. If we assume he knows the violent nature of some of his followers. (June 6th of course he knows) by definition terrorism even if legally not. As the choice is likely done as a threat to control their political expressions.
But no the first amendment in no way provides protection for you based on your speech. Just a probation on government specifically passing laws to prevent it.
Pete Hahnloser ( @Powderhorn@beehaw.org ) English2•2 months agoAh, yes … June 6, a day that will live in infamy.