You must log in or register to comment.
Global Times, a major Chinese propaganda tabloid,
The Daily Mail, 🤣
Pots and kettles eh 🤣
Why use the word “claim” for something that’s painfully and obviously true? 🤔
NGL, I had already learned of collapse and how cooked we were back then, but I thought it was exaggerated and that we had some time to go before things really started to pick up…
Context: global times is not a “newspaper”. It’s Chinese nationalist English media. Their proper state run media is much more formal and reserved. For example look at Xinhua.
Propaganda about the enemy usually doesn’t require altering the truth much. Propaganda about the own state of affairs is a completely different story.
That’s actually not true, with respect to altering the truth. Usually the quantity or quality of a single truth is heavily distorted, or outright fabricated. See Iraq’s WMD that never matetialized.
Fair enough. Gotta think about this a little more I guess.
Very frequently propaganda relies on a single kernal of truth, and then changing the quantity, quality, or both of said truth. All it needs is some level of justification, then it can be molded like clay into whatever you need it to say.
When the audience/readership has no effective way of fact-checking what is said then they can (and do) just make it up to suit their narrative. Anything that contradicts the narrative is an “unreliable source.”
And you are lynching Negroes Not that I’m suggesting they’re wrong or I’m defending Trump
I like that liberals have decided that criticizing the USA is inherently fallacious.
I didn’t even remotely suggested anything like this
Ok, I wouldn’t expect you to be honest about it anyway.
Would be more fallacious if they weren’t actually lynching black people tbh
Of course, “one without sin among you should be the first to throw a stone”, I’m not a fan of US but also not a fan of PRC
Equal condemnation for unequal things just ends up being support for the status quo, though.
Whataboutism
Yeah, and?