Trump’s heresy was not literally true, but it was grounded in a fundamental truth that has been denied to Americans so the national security state could bilk them for billions.
Yes, the state in russia started the invasion. Thanks for just saying it.
Y’all wackos can say whatever you want about how ukraine was wearing a hot dress or whatnot. It doesn’t matter.
https://tankie.tube/w/8oEAyZfQY6SwqpYmoEkWxJ libs and minimizing genocide. Name a more iconic duo.
Y’all can pretend this is analogous to any sort of abuse to obfuscate the fact that you refuse to learn a single fucking bit of history regarding the war, but the intervention was legal under Ukrainian law itself. States have a right to secede via referendum, did so after the US funded nazi coup, and begged Russia to stop the indiscriminate shelling of civilians by the maidan regime that ensued for almost a decade after.
Several peace agreements had been reached to stop Ukraine from bombing civilians, but the ultra right within the Ukrainian army refused to abide by them. There’s videos of Zelensky ordering them to do it and them treating him like an irrelevant idiot.
Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: tankie ass response
- BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict
- Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians
- Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences.
- The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda
- The Guardian, 2017: ‘I want to bring up a warrior’: Ukraine’s far-right children’s camp – video
- WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know
- Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem
- The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
- openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences
- Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia
- Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties?
- Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements
- NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide
When somebody’s making sense but it’s making you angry
“she didn’t want to be raped, she just dressed like a slut”
Looking into the author, he’s basically a russian journalist at this point.
Fuck of, putin lover
Ukraine openly stated they want nukes and nato membership.
And Russia quickly demonstrated why Ukraine was right to want such things.
deleted by creator
Explain to me how Ukraine wanting to join an alliance that includes the US is anyone trying to defend themselves from the US.
deleted by creator
How would the US react if Mexico wanted nukes from Russia?
Given that the US has already been telegraphing that they want to invade Mexico I would not blame Mexico for looking at all available options to defend themselves.
Ok but how would the US react if Mexico wanted nukes from Russia?
like it did with cuba
Nukes in the hands of the madman coke addict Zelenskyy?! Yeah, right — really thought that through, didn’t you? 🤦🏽♂️
I agree with no nukes for coke addicts, Trump should be impeached.
Well them are some outrageous unfounded claims. Ya got any evidence of that beyond a doctored interview and some Russian funded Cameos?
deleted by creator
Reading thru your post history was entertaining. Sorry about your diagnosis.
Some people are so propagandized that if trump says water is wet they will say its dry
Please don’t post articles that are behind hard paywalls, or if you do, paste in the relevant parts of it.
people put things like THAT behind paywalls?
@schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de One can read for free.
how did everyone access the article?
I would like to know if its the same tired 40 year old argument on “sphere of influence” or actually something interesting at least from the “intellectual elasticity” point of view?
