megopie ( @megopie@beehaw.org ) 5•19 hours agoTheir monetary losses are insubstantial compared to the gains in power they will receive from further weakening the influence and power of the average person.
Beegzoidberg ( @Beegzoidberg@beehaw.org ) 1•20 hours agoHey thanks for posting this! My trivia guy asked this at the bar last night and I remembered the whole graphic so we won a gift card!
Shifty Eyes ( @shifty@leminal.space ) English40•2 days agoIts all losses on paper, unrealized losses.
I could see them all coming out ahead in some other way, tax minimization, write downs/write offs, other financial methods not accessible to normal people that don’t have a fleet of accounts and tax lawyers on retainer. And they’ll all be ready to profit massively during and after any future crash.
The cynic in me says that they all have a bunch of call/put options, algorithmic high frequency trading and dark pools at the ready, or other bets that’ll make them massively rich and any upcoming stock market crash is calculated and planned by influencing a bought president. Maybe that’s giving them too much credit but the people that advise these billionaires and the president are definitely ready to profit off of whatever is coming.
Altima NEO ( @altima_neo@lemmy.zip ) English25•2 days agoAlso the bit that everyone’s leaving out, since election day, all these guys had huge boosts to their stocks. All the current losses basically corrected whatever gains they got since November.
Basically, they aren’t hurting yet.
August27th ( @August27th@lemmy.ca ) 11•2 days agoBasically, they aren’t hurting yet.
Exactly. You could reduce their wealth by a factor of 1000, and they would still have more than 90% of people. They will never be genuinely hurt by losses. Not like 99% of people would be.
The chart shouldn’t make anyone happy. The true horror of it should be realized; in reality it’s an accounting of how much they’re “spending” money to make money. They will continue to make more. The scales here are unfathomable to most people.
It’s borderline misinformation to not include their total wealth for context.
AMomentToBreath ( @AMomentToBreath@beehaw.org ) 5•2 days agoIt is misinformation. It was probably designed to make us think we’ve won and to relax our gaurd
Radiant_sir_radiant ( @Radiant_sir_radiant@beehaw.org ) 11•2 days agoI don’t know. I were filthy rich, I for one probably wouldn’t mind a small (and quite likely temporary) hit on my net worth if it means I get to buy promising upstarts and some of my competitors for small change because they’re now grossly underfunded/undervalued thanks to the crash.
But then again, I’m a cynic, and probably just projecting here.
prole ( @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 9•2 days agoReally? Because if I had even a fraction of their wealth, I would stop working and just enjoy my life because I already had far more money than I could ever need. I would fund passion projects, and give away money to causes that I believe are important.
These are not normal people. It’s never enough for them.
Megaman_EXE ( @Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org ) 1•14 hours agoI think they are people with an endless greed that feeds into itself. With their money, they can generate millions in passive income just by having investments. The system rewards their behavior
An analogy that pops into my head is when you have people that are high rank in a multiplayer game, create a new account so that they can be paired with people who are just starting out. The system feels like it’s just letting smurf accounts demolish everyone.
That analogy maybe isn’t perfect, though, because it implies the ultra wealthy are more skilled when it’s really just a resource allocation issue.
All cynicism aside, so would I, probably. What good is immense wealth if you don’t use it as a means to gain happiness?
As much as it pains me to say this as a decades-long passionate M$ hater, Bill Gates is doing something right there.But you’re right about one thing of course …
These are not normal people. It’s never enough for them.
jarfil ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 5•2 days agoIMHO Melinda changed Gates’s view on the world. As much as her desktop idea was nightmare fuel, they did create a foundation, had some kids together, and that let Gates grow as a person away from Ballmer’s “Developers, Developers, Developers!” culture.
KeenFlame ( @KeenFlame@feddit.nu ) 6•2 days agoThat’s the neat part. You don’t give them credit. Their lawyers and hedge funds do this for them and are rewarded the more fraudulent they can get
Damage ( @Damage@feddit.it ) 24•2 days agoI was writing that it’s not a bad price to pay to establish a feudal system where you’re part of the oligarchy, but honestly, what do they need more than they already have? The current system gave them everything they could ever wish to obtain.
prole ( @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 27•2 days agowhat do they need more than they already have?
These people have an illness. They wouldn’t be billionaires if they didn’t have an all-consuming desire to obtain and hoard wealth and power at all costs.
leftytighty ( @leftytighty@slrpnk.net ) English14•2 days agoThey still have people that can say no to them, their workers can quit, they need to deal with consumers boycotting their products.
Globally, China is rapidly catching up to and surpassing Americans in more and more industries, and they need to protect their status.
Nothing is enough for them.
Sir_Kevin ( @Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English9•2 days agoNothing is enough for them.
This is what it comes down to. They will never be satisfied. There is no end…
leftytighty ( @leftytighty@slrpnk.net ) English6•2 days agoWe could oblige and give them an end and the nothing that would finally satisfy them :)
Legal disclaimer: I mean butts
superkret ( @superkret@feddit.org ) 11•2 days agoI’m legit wondering who even profits from Trump’s politics?
If regular people are getting fucked and billionaires lose wealth and the stock market tanks, who comes out on top?Apart from the European military industrial complex?
ascense ( @ascense@lemm.ee ) 2•1 day agoI’ve been wondering the same about a lot of right wing economic policy. Why push for policy that is a net negative for everyone in the long run? I have since realized that it does make sense if you don’t look at it in terms of wealth, but rather in terms of power. The control you have over other people doesn’t depend on your absolute wealth, but rather the relative wealth you have compared to others, and so for someone looking for that kind of power (i.e. most billionaires as far as I can tell) it wouldn’t matter if something they do hurts everybody, as long as it hurts you more than it hurts them.
100_kg_90_de_belin ( @100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it ) 15•2 days agoBy making it impossibile for the state to run, so that private companies will step in and charge people for stuff. That and destroying small and medium enterprises allowing companies to buy on the cheap
jarfil ( @jarfil@beehaw.org ) 8•2 days agoAnyone who plays it right:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_(finance)
Bonus points for anyone with insider information.
sqgl ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) 2•1 day agoThe on again, off again tariffs are a great way for Trump to exploit insider trading for his own benefit. I have not seen a single journalist cotton on and most of the Left are circle-jerking about him being stupid. He is evil.
Hirom ( @Hirom@beehaw.org ) 9•2 days agoTrump and Putin seem to like each other.
Maeve ( @Maeve@kbin.earth ) 5•2 days agoThe people with real money and power are taking huge gains. They are and will not suffer losses, other than temporary, strategic losses. This is prestidigitation. We’re focused on exactly what they want us to see, not what’s happening while we continue to be entertained by side shows.
dustycups ( @prex@aussie.zone ) 10•2 days ago“He only had one dick and one stomach”
Ben EltonThese losses mean nothing to these people.
superkret ( @superkret@feddit.org ) 5•2 days agoIf the numbers mean nothing to them, then why are they literally destroying societies and killing people to make the numbers go up?
dustycups ( @prex@aussie.zone ) 3•1 day agoGood question - I don’t know.
Perhaps its more aboutbeinghaving the biggestdicknumber relative to others.
Perhaps its something to do with power.The Ben Elton reference was to a book (stark) set in the 80s.
Dr. Taco ( @drtaco@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) English12•2 days agoSocieties and people mean less than nothing to them.
nuko147 ( @nuko147@lemm.ee ) English9•2 days agoOK but since January 17. What about before? Because i know Musk doubled his money when Trump got elected.
sqgl ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) 3•1 day agoYes, Tesla stocks are merely back to pre-election levels. Looks like they will keep dropping though.
see_i_did ( @see_i_did@lemm.ee ) English2•1 day agoPlease, if there is a god.
sqgl ( @sqgl@beehaw.org ) 2•1 day agoThey just climbed today. Maybe Musk (via proxies) is buying while cheap because he has insider info that a subsidy is about to be handed to Tesla.
I suspect that is the point of the yoyo tariffs: insider trading.
alykanas ( @alykanas@slrpnk.net ) English6•2 days agoDoesn’t include the gains they made on trumps election
tetris11 ( @tetris11@lemmy.ml ) 3•2 days agoDo you reckon that some people voted for Trump just because they knew he was so incompetent that he would inadvertently fuck shit up for everyone, friends included - and that there are enough disillusioned people in the US fed up of any semblance of the status quo (progressive or otherwise) who just wanted to watch the world burn as much as they’re suffering?
A vote of pure spite and nihilism
The Bard in Green ( @thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz ) 2•24 hours agoThere are tankies that proudly did this.
tetris11 ( @tetris11@lemmy.ml ) 1•24 hours agoI believe it, means to an ends or whatever
AllNewTypeFace ( @AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space ) 1•2 days agoI’m sure that a man as fond of Nazi dogwhistles as Musk will appreciate the fact that, given that a B looks like an 8, his losses are almost a Nazi codeword.