Fancy cupcakes are 70% icing, really not that nice and a waste of money

        • SCmSTR ( SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you ever make your own bathroom or get your choice in the matter, go full french: get the separate porcelain fixture that has separate hot and cold valves, with the soap and towel.

          I have a Toto seat and, while it’s nice, the stream is small, leaking potential poo water down your legs onto the inner edges of the seat is… (It doesn’t seem to happen, but still), and the internal warm water tank is small.

          I used my ex’s much cheaper one a bunch when we were dating, and his was cold only but like a garden hose flow rate. It was so fucking fast and felt so much nicer. But didn’t oscillate, have aim, pressure, heated seat, dryer, or any of that stuff…

          Plus, without the soap, I don’t really want to use a towel to dry my bits off.

          So ideally, it would be temperature adjustable, PORCELAIN AND NOT PLASTIC, high flow/adjustable, be an actual bidet where you can fit your hands down there to wash yourself with soap and water, and then have a designated towel so that you eliminate more if not all tp usage.

    • edric ( scytale@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hard agree. Bidet + soap is the most hygienic way. I was actually surprised to learn that even some bidet users don’t use soap and literally just blast their ass and hope it washes away everything. You’re already halfway there, might as well use soap and be completely clean.

          • SCmSTR ( SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Some people can’t see well from birth… doesn’t mean you can’t get glasses, or in your case go see a doctor (and get a poop infusion to fix your gut flora XD ).

            But seriously, it could be worth checking out. Maybe you have a tumor or cancer or one of those beowold smeagals or whatever

            Edit: bezoar. Seriously it could be curable and you could poop once a day. Think of the free time for activities!

            • dditty ( dditty@lemm.ee ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I also poop several times a day. Went and saw a doctor and he said “yup, totally common, and nothing to worry about.” Normal humans poop between 1-6x a day. Pretty crazy that there can be such a variance.

      • edric ( scytale@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I do several rounds as well and I can tell you washing with soap and water using a bidet is much milder than wiping yourself raw with toilet paper. Washing once per round also takes the same amount of time as wiping several times until you feel “clean”.

  • SCmSTR ( SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I posted a comment on Reddit telling about how the word racism really means a person who is a subscriber to the pseudoscience that is race.

    Tons of people downvoted me then reddit admins removed the content for harassment, of all things. (None of it made sense to me)

    I’m sad that people still think that people are different races, and to not be racist you just have to not put one over or under another, when the crux of the problem is fundamentally that people don’t get that race was made up because long ago dumb people thought that people that looked different were a literal different species but couldn’t prove it so made up the word race as a subcategory in the taxonomic system, but finally scientists realized it’s complete bullshit since it’s impossible to define, total bullshit, wildly inconsistent, and massively harmful… and I’m sad that people there literally couldn’t comprehend that, and got so mad or offended that they censured the information and thought I was arguing against the existence of systemic racism or something that only a dumb piece of shit would misinterpret.

    I linked the Wikipedia page for racism which explains all of it, including history and stuff.

    I was triggered for like a week trying to figure out what I said wrong, and honestly still kinda bothered.

    But, that is what race is: a bigoted idea that different people are different races and shouldn’t/can’t interbreed. And that’s the stupidest bullshit that MOST people don’t understand, and I’ll die on this hill, explaining that we gotta stop all being racists. Yeah, fix the problems like systemic racism, but stop thinking of people with darker or lighter skin as different - they’re just warm weather humans or cold weather humans, the same way buff or skinny humans are. Fuck. We’re all literally just humans, an amazing species, capable of adaptation and survival.

    • Annoyed_🦀  ( psx_crab@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’re right, but imo the disagreement i feels like really stem from the way you put it, as you talk about race in a biological science while they think you’re talking about ethnicity(social science?), and then there’s this odd fixation with no compromise which kinda what caused the friction, even though i think both party might agree with each other.

      Also reddit and online forum is mostly made up of weird people so idk.

    • 7U5K3N ( 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man… I got banned from a kink community sub because I edited my comment with a automagical editor…

      It replaced my text with gobbledygook and then was going to delete it…

      The mod came across the text said something to the extent of “this makes no sense” and banned me under their “because we can” rule.

      I sent the mod a message with links and an explanation… he came back with your original post is gone. So you are too.

      My reddit account is 14 years old…

      It bothered me for a while too… and still dones I guess since I’m here talking about it… but honestly mods are gonna mod… they are small people with a smidge of “power” you could have said hope “you folks have a great day!!” And gotten banned.

      It happens. Sucks tho

      • SCmSTR ( SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I’m stopping using Reddit because of how fascist things are now around the world, in hopes of keeping access to my similarly old account because there may be a lot of porn on there, but there’s also a ton of good resources and important things.

        Maybe if things turn around in a few years, I’ll consider resume using reddit. But the more-intelligent-than-a-rock part of me knows otherwise.

        Too many people getting banned for fascist and sketchy reasons. So instead of participate there, it’s now just an archive to me.

    • lazynooblet ( lazynooblet@lazysoci.al ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We are all different, I don’t know how you can deny that. And some differences can depend on where your ancestors are from.

      If it’s not “race” then is there another way of describing it?

      In animals we call it breeds. Sounds weird.

      I think as an advanced species we should be capable of ascending beyond the descriminating behaviour based on origin. I know it’s possible as I can. Seeing other people first reactions to meeting people get described with race undertones is alien to me and feels disrespectful.

      • SCmSTR ( SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well the problem with trying to subdivide humans is that

        A) it’s actually really really hard to do, so hard in fact that it’s impossible and is a pseudoscience B) it basically always results in comparison. Which gets bad REALLY quickly because suddenly there is a better or worse, an inferior and superior.

        I’m not saying we aren’t different, I’m not saying that.

        But, as far as species, we ARE all the same. You, your sister, your neighbor, your great great great grandfather. We all have our differences and generic differences, but they’re infinitesimally small, we are just VERY good at telling the differences because we’re so used to staring at the same face over and over.

        There’s just so much crossover and mixing and volatility. People can change from one to the other or halfway and stuff, there’s no clarity. Like, me, for example: I’m a mix that people look at me and get very wrong 95% of the time. And then if I have kids with somebody that doesn’t have the exact same mixed heritage with me, it’s like… Wtf do you even call me?

        And then if you learn some anthropology and learn that long thin limbs and people are from hot climates close to the equator, and short ratioed people are from further (surface area to mass ratio, keeping warmth) away from the equator where it’s cold.

        Like… You can be vague and descriptive a little about it, but when you realize that reality is just that we’re all the same species, with no limits to interbreeding, it makes so much more sense.

        Let’s say you take a pale-ass white guy and strand them near the equator for ten years outdoors. Does that guy suddenly become a different breed or race or whatever you want to call it? No… it’s the same person, the same species, even if he looks different - he just adapted and his body is like “holy fuck it’s hot and I’m trying my best to not get skin cancer and the right amount of vitamins from the sun”.

        And same thing for brown skinned people (let’s just say Mexican natives). You take a young couple with darker brown skin, and move them to norway or somewhere cold with VERY little sun (latitude). They are going to lose melatonin in their skin and become paler. Let’s say they have kids and you inbreed them for a few generations. They will get progressively more pale, and start to look more adapted to the region, likely even take on regional issues.

        And the reason why is because we’re all the same type of monkey. (Not actually monkey because that’s a different offshoot, but primate; we’re great apes!).

        • moonlight ( moonlight@fedia.io ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah humans are actually all pretty close genetically compared to other species. And “race” as defined by society isn’t even a good predictor of genetic similarities, so for example if you take random people A and B who are black, and person C who is white, B and C will often be more closely related than A and B.

          Also as a sidenote, we are monkeys. Apes are now considered to be a type of monkey taxonomically.

        • lazynooblet ( lazynooblet@lazysoci.al ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mostly agree with you. And I commend your principles.

          Some of your examples need improving is all I’ll say.

          Like sending a white guy to the equator for a decade. Okay fine, they go dark skinned. But bring him back up north and he is white again. Send a super dark skinned guy far north and he will get somewhat paler, so it works both ways. But they retain that difference because they are different.

          We have developed differences mostly based on our origin in the world, be it Asian, African, Egyptian, Indian, etc, but we are such an internationally mixed people the differences are meaningless.

          • SCmSTR ( SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually, yes, and actually, no.

            If you take a white person and put them in the equator for multiple generations, they’ll turn brown. If you try to put the result back north, it’ll take them multiple generations to get pale again.

            There isn’t really an inherent difference between us. There are small mutations or diseases that can kill, like Alzheimer’s, but those are all basically incidental. Your genes can change, that’s what evolution is.

            We ALL came from Africa, anyway, and then settled down in various places for a while, adapting. The longer people have adapted, the more they’ve adapted. But it doesn’t set anything in stone, and everybody still retains that ability to adapt.

      • 7U5K3N ( 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ve never had infants around other infants.

        We all have the same child. They all act the same behavior is the same… Patterns are the same Etc…

        Humans don’t really start to develop in different directions and speed until they are like 18 months old.

        Our coloring and physical features might not be the same… but the basic operating system and internals are all the same across humanity.

        • lazynooblet ( lazynooblet@lazysoci.al ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes I agree, this is human. Just the same as all dogs wag their tail and bark. Like other posters have said, the differences are subtle and we are all more the same than different.

      • RandomMouse ( RandomMouse@slrpnk.net ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Breeds are defined by organizations that determine breed based on lineage, followed by conformation. They do not align across different countries. Dogs have the AKC, CKC in America. They don’t follow the same definitions. It also causes lots of issues to classify things like this and leads to bad decision making by lots of people. Even as it is now, there’s no clear definition for things like Pit Bulls. There’s also a ton of health issues that arise from defining breeds and trying to follow this logic.

        Humans are not controlled and bred based on these things so a Breed Standard would not be possible. There is simply a continuous line of people.

        Perform a cluster analysis on dogs - they will kind of fall into clusters because we bred selectively for them. But humans, which have not been selectively bred even in smaller geographic regions, would not provide decent clustering results based on race categories.

        Without good clustering, whatever groups you make have more inaccuracies than accuracies in your grouped statements. (Border collies are high energy, greyhounds are lazy > 65% true at best) this is because of the insane complexity of DNA and the lack of selective breeding artificially limiting the DNA diversity. Plus other stuff.

    • Sunsofold ( Sunsofold@lemmings.world ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been thinking like that for a long time but recently I’ve been thinking about it in terms of internalized opposition. One of the most pernicious elements of the fight against stupid and bad ideologies is when their framings gain dominance even in the minds of their opponents.

      At some point, someone said ‘black people are blah, white people are bleh,’ and the person next to them probably said ‘What do you mean black people?’ because the concept was new but the ideology of race turned into such a common one that people who were oppressed by it were forced to consider what the powerful thought about it, like an atheist prisoner being forced to think about how to convince a Christian jailer to be less awful to them. They internalized it. And now even people who are ‘anti-racist’ often treat ‘blackness’ and ‘whiteness’ as if they were real, and not just conceptually different in the same way you can live in a different country without moving because the lines on a map change. Even as they battle the concept, they try to do it from within the system, prisoners demanding to be free without acknowledging the world outside the prison walls.

  • Skua ( Skua@kbin.earth ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably a literal one, I like hillwalking and am clumsy

    Metaphorically, it’s guitar tonewoods. If you’ve got a solidbody electric guitar you can make the body out of a goddamn breezeblock and it’ll sound absolutely fine. Whatever difference the body/neck material makes is negligible compared to strings, scale length, pickups, resistors, and amps. Acoustic guitars are another matter, but for solidbody electrics it is 99% delusion and marketing

  • LisoPaine ( LisoPaine@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nuclear energy is currently the best way to achieve energetic independence until we find out how to maintain a fusion core running for more than 20 minute.

    • Longpork3 ( Longpork3@lemmy.nz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Solar started to beat out nuclear in terms of LCOE a few years ago. We should continue to operate all of our current nuclear reactors as long as it is safe to do so, but planning new builds today given how cheap solar is just doesnt make sense.

      • eestileib ( eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t have the storage to use solar for base load energy yet.

        Factories and mills and chip fabs and industrial refrigeration needs to run all the time, and needs reliable constant power.

        Solar is -awesome- for distributed generation where loads peak based on insolation (classic example being a/c units). Residential power demand is also just generally higher during the day.

        Nuclear for constant demand, solar for circadian and insolation-based needs is a pretty good mix to start, certainly a hell of a lot better than what we have now.

        • sexy_peach ( sexy_peach@feddit.org ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          We don’t have the storage to use solar for base load energy yet.

          Base load is a myth in large connected grids. They have wind and solar. Solar hits the high day demand, wind is always blowing somewhere so there’s nights demand covered as well.

          Methane peaker plants are good until better solutions are cheaper.

          Factories and mills and chip fabs and industrial refrigeration needs to run all the time, and needs reliable constant power.

          They don’t actually necessarily need reliable power if they will get discounts, but that’s somewhat in the future. Industrial refrigeration certainly doesn’t need reliable power at all if they can get variable prices.

          Also peaker plants exist for the few hours per year where prices are at max.

    • Energetic independence

      Speaking as an American? Energetic Independence From who? The United States and Canada have big fossil fuel reserves. The US is even the biggest exporter of them. And I guess the rest of the West can count on Australian and Canadian fossil fuel exports. If anyone needs fossil fuel independence its China. And the west would profit from a slower transition to nuclear power there, as this allows to apply more external pressure by increasing oil prices.

  • JohnnyCanuck ( JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unless the post itself is a commentary, posters should put their own opinions in the comments, not the title or description.

    That way they can be up/downvoted and discussed separately.

  • The Petty One: Optical Media is Bad. It has always been and always will be. We used it for as long as we did because there was no better choice. But when it came to music I went straight from tape to mp3 because I never trusted CD’s, and I will continue not to trust CD’s.

    The Serious One That Might Ruffle Feathers: The entire school curriculum of every country should be wiped out – And replaced with fifteen years of nothing but reading comprehension. We live in an era where information is extremely cheap but knowledge is priceless. And to go from information to knowledge, one needs to have a well developed reading ability and bullshit filter. There’s no point memorising a bunch of nonsense when it is easier and faster to use technology – We stopped doing recitations when we invented writing, you know? – What IS important is understanding what you are seeing and recognising lies for what they are.

    • Devmapall ( Devmapall@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Reading comprehension is incredibly important. Bullshit filter also sorely needed. I get very frustrated when I see people falling for obvious false information. I’ve been shown AI videos that are clearly fake but they believe it.

      I think my favorite are conspiracy theories who won’t believe something backed with like, facts, but will believe this 30 seconds tik Tok from someone they don’t know quoting someone they also don’t know.

      • Flagstaff ( Flagstaff@programming.dev ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Go on… so what’s the right one? I can’t understand why anyone would go to attack others without offering a superior alternative. Like, you may as well just not say anything, then. If you don’t have a better idea, then theirs isn’t worse because you didn’t even provide a rebuttal.

        I’m not even on the side of the person you responded to, but why would you not want to state what would work better? That’s just trolling.

          • Flagstaff ( Flagstaff@programming.dev ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But you’re not offering even any example of possible models so how can anyone take your position seriously if you refuse to share more of your stance when asked? Lack of transparency is not cool, as well as assuming; I never once said one-size-fits-all.

              • Flagstaff ( Flagstaff@programming.dev ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                “Given your performance?” Since when were discussions, heated or not, a performance? I never said anyone was right or wrong here with their stance towards education, but you’ve only said to not treat it as a single issue and nothing more, which is what I have beef with. When I asked, “so what’s the right one,” I didn’t say that I believe there is any “one” right way of education, but you’re continually saying to just read “a modern textbook on education” without even suggesting exactly what to read. What such book do you recommend?

                I have not once called you “arrogant,” I have not called you “a techie,” and I have not said you have been “spewing drivel”; name-calling is the territory of Reddit and I hope we can agree to leave it there, but you didn’t even bother to reply to the original commentator’s response, maybe because he’s right; that’s what I was going off of. All I’m getting at is to not troll people in that closed way.

    • PurpleSkull ( PurpleSkull@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s correct. In school the most important thing you can possibly learn is to learn. Information is abundant and easily accessible, the school, university or even research labs are no longer gatekeepers of information. But knowing HOW to find resources, HOW to filter it, HOW to use it, HOW to sit your ass down and work with information in a meaningful way is a specialized and rare skill.

  • Fahrenheit is a perfectly cromulent unit of measure when the use case is for referencing human comfort.

    The rage it incites in others on the internet is just a side benefit. It’s hilariously awe-inspiring just how wound up some people get over a personal preference for a unit of measure. Mr. Fahrenheit should be proud of what he accomplished.

    • SpaceCowboy ( SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You feel like Fahrenheit is good enough because it’s what your used to. Just say that and it’s all good.

      I use Celsius for weather because a) I’m used to it and b) where I live, knowing the temperature relevant to the freezing point of water is extremely relevant when considering the weather. You use Fahrenheit for the weather only because you’re used to it. There’s no benefit other than that.

      I do use Fahrenheit for cooking, but not because it’s better in any way, but simply because I’m used to it. I know the effect setting the oven to 400, 350, 300, etc, will have. It’s not a better unit of measure, I’m just used to it, and in the context of using my oven, it’s not worthwhile to me to learn the equivalents in Celsius.

      It’s ok to say you prefer something simply because that’s what you’re used to using. But Celsius is a better unit of measure, just you’re not used to it. You know what 70F, 80F, 90F, 100F feels like from experience, ie. you’re used to using that scale. It’s fine… just weird to say something is better simply because it’s what you’re accustomed to.

      • Ohmmy ( Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The problem with Celsius and it’s relation to the freezing and boiling point of water is that water is a rare chemical that is less dense as a solid so it will freeze AND boil at different temperatures depending on pressure.

        Freezing temperature isn’t 0 at 1500 meters and it doesn’t boil at 100 either.

        Edit to add examples:

        On Mount Everest water boils at 72 degrees

        In Denver, Colorado water boils at 94 degrees

            • SpaceCowboy ( SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you think water boils at 212F at high altitudes? No matter which temperature scale is used, the “billions of people” living at high altitudes need to understand how pressure affects the boiling point of water.

              I think the billions of people you imagine living on top of Mount Everest understand they may need to make adjustments to cooking instructions regardless of what temperature scale they’re using. If they don’t, using Fahrenheit won’t solve their problems.

              • Ohmmy ( Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                My hell dude, you’re missing the point so hard you’re either a troll or so belligerent you’re not worth talking to. Never once did I say Fahrenheit was better, it’s like you’re just shadowboxing with yourself at this point.

      • I never said Fahrenheit was better, just that it was perfectly acceptable for use as a measure of human comfort.

        I’m not going to get into what I usually go into because I only commented to answer OPs question, not start a(nother) internet flame war. A lot of people who use Celsius go absolutely NUTS when someone so much as hints that Fahrenheit has some usefulness.

        • SpaceCowboy ( SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a deprecated unit of measure. In a lot of forums like this one, there’s a lot of people that work in the technology field and we’re always annoyed by people that insist on sticking with something that’s deprecated because people invent rationalizations for why the thing they’re used to is better. I use Fahrenheit for cooking but I’m not telling people I do that because it’s better in some why, I know I’m using a deprecated unit of measure solely because I’m used to it.

    • SCmSTR ( SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is not in the accuracy, ease, and convenience of describing and being compatible with the human experience. It has never been that.

      The issue is Fahrenheit’s/imperial units’ compatibility and division factor of 10’s compatibility with other units, and all of those scales and units being consistent and predictable.

      It’s literally just two philosophies of going about seeing the world.

      To disclose my bias, I was brought up with imperial units. The problem in most discussions of these two ideas facing off is that nobody discusses the real topic: The pros and cons of unification vs. the rote arbitrariness of the human existence and whether or not we want to stand behind yet again another self-centered description of the universe.

      Measuring horses with hands is fucking weird, but because we experience horses from our own perspective, which is limited to our physical body, measuring in hands is a really easy way to understand that unit of measurement, as opposed to decimals of meters.

      • However, I must point out, Celsius is not metric. It’s been adopted as the step-child of SI, but it’s not metric. You can’t meaningfully multiply and divide degrees Celsius; 100°C is not ten times hotter than 10°C Celsius. Sure. you can use the metric prefixes, just like i could measure things in kiloinches, that doesn’t make it metric. It’s just as arbitrary as Fahrenheit, and people have to make arguments regarding water and life to try to pretend otherwise. True, it’s officially defined in terms of Kelvin, but then, so is Fahrenheit.

      • Longpork3 ( Longpork3@lemmy.nz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was watching a video just before where an american measured two impact craters on a piece of steel, read off some gibberish fractional inches for each one then commented “my math isnt great, but i think that one is about double”. My dude, your calipers read off approximately 5mm and 10mm, your life would be so much easier if you toggled it to metric units.