Creative Cloud Pro arrives with more AI, higher prices, and a familiar feeling of déjà vu

  • the_q ( the_q@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why “industry standard” is such a stupid concept. Adobe knows they have a stranglehold on creative professionals.

    • abdominable ( abdominable@lemm.ee ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s the ‘professionals’ fault, they got locked into that shit years ago because it’s what they learned in school and they don’t want to learn anything else even though there are alternatives.

      I’m just happy when they don’t imsist on an overpriced Mac just to use Adobe.

      • nasi_goreng ( nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t say its their fault tho.

        Professional will use software that suitable for their workflow. I’ve seen professionals changing their main software if there was better alternative.

        For example, there are wave of professional that are moving from Adobe to Affinity. Illustrator and comic artist are moving from Photoshop to Clip Studio Paint or Procreate. Some video editor will instantly change their software to Davinci Resolve.

        Most of the time, they can’t change their software because their client requires file compability, such as Photoshop-native PSD. Sure, other software can open/edit PSD, but they might not fully support all PSD format specification.

        That’s why people on open source community focused on open format and open workflow instead. Inkscape use SVG. Krita use ORA. And so on.

      • I really hate it when people blame consumers for problems instead of producers. Let’s go ahead and examine your hypothesis.

        • someone wants to learn how to be a designer
        • they spend time and money being taught Adobe products in a bootcamp or school
        • since they aren’t defined by their job, they do literally anything else in their free time rather than bringing school home with them
        • occasionally they see other stuff like Affinity or GIMP but the interface is radically different from what they’re learning or an important feature requires more time to figure out than they can budget
        • they get a job that requires Adobe
        • years later, when they have purchasing authority, they’re told they need to cut costs and decide maybe researching is a good idea
        • the first results for Adobe alternatives are just a bunch of Lemmy threads calling them lazy

        Can you point out where in this process our hypothetical user should have done something different? And more importantly why it’s this person’s fault they’ve been vendor-locked their whole career? Note that a critical assumption I’m making here is that not everyone is a power user because, unsurprisingly, not everyone is a power user.

      • almost1337 ( almost1337@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know how much I can blame the non-tech-savvy professionals on their selection of software, especially when the alternatives aren’t broadly known or understood.

  • Rentlar ( Rentlar@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago
    • Creative Club software subscription
    • Create tiers to segment what people are receptive to being squeezed in order to maintain all features
    • Add a premium currency in addition to the subscription for AI features
    • Make tiers of premium currency that can be used for some features but not others…

    Did an AI make this pricing strategy with the aim to double and triple dip on their customers as much as possible?