• Fake news. Modern RPis need up to 25W PSU. Even old laptops could idle lower than that, as otherwise they wouldn’t be able to get significant battery life. Turning off the screen will also really lower their power consumption.

      • You’re comparing a laptop at idle to the power supply for a pi that needs to power it at full load plus overhead and inefficiencies. That’s like comparing apples to an orange tree.

        • I mean sure. If you want to compare actual efficiency then performance per watt is the metric. Here a laptop would easily win as it has higher performance for similar power. The TDP of a U class processor is only 15W normally. It would obviously help to disable things like Turbo Boost as well. Said laptop having more performance wouldn’t need to stay at high power states for as long as the Pi either as it takes less time to process requests. Returning back to idle faster is a big advantage.

  •  Korhaka   ( @Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    6 months ago

    Power consumption is a massive reason to really not do that. Its cheap for a reason, its takes a shitload of power to be shit and you will pay more in energy than you save in hardware unless its only powered on for short periods of time - a server typically isn’t.

    This is actually something that applies to cheap products too. Was in Asda a little while ago and saw 2 LED bulbs with the same lumen rating. Cheaper one used 3w more and you only saved £1. Running it for 8 hours a day for a year would cost double that saving in electricity. For a server you are looking at almost £2 per watt each year. Does that ewaste look so good to you now?

    Some things are absolutely worth getting second hand, but you really should be careful considering the power cost as well.

    Quick edit: If you don’t need it running 24/7, consider something like AWS too. I love selfhosting but if its not running much it might be cheaper to not bother buying hardware.

    •  pineapple   ( @pineapple@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is generally not true. If you are using your laptop as a home server chances are it’s going to be idling 99% of the time and laptops are generally pretty good in terms of idle power draw if you manage to disable the screen (or just disconnect it, take it off and find a way to repurpose it)

      And in terms of environmental impact saving a laptop from landfill is definitely better since the majority of a computers impact is from the co2 emmissions from the manufacturing process. And this isn’t taking into account the likely ethical considerations such as supporting terrible mining practices for resources like cobalt.

    •  Allero   ( @Allero@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      Aren’t laptops typically very energy efficient? Low consumption converts to high battery life, which is a priority for laptop hardware.

      Some of them consume less than 10W.

    •  HugeNerd   ( @HugeNerd@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are you living on a space station? What is this shitload of power? A whole 60 watts? Are you rationing AA batteries to run your household?

      What is it with the bullshit fanciful rationalizations people come up with to consume consume consume?

      •  Frater Mus   ( @fratermus@lemmy.sdf.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Are you living on a space station? What is this shitload of power?

        Some of us live off-grid and make every Watt-hour we consume. So it may be that one man’s fanciful bullshit is another man’s daily life. For context, this is my 2,461st day offgrid.

        A whole 60 watts?

        Over the last 30 days I’ve averaged 2.01kWh/day, or an average constant consumption of 84w. All in. And that’s on the high end for folks in similar use cases. In this scenario adding in another 60w would be significant (ie, impossible for my rig during winter months).

        As Sesame Street taught showed us it’s a matter of perspective.


        •  Thebigguy   ( @Thebigguy@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Um if you’re living with computers are you really „off the grid“ computers require the grid to be manufactured. If you’re off the grid because you worry about the way the worlds going and you think you’ll need to be off the grid to survive I wouldn’t make having access to computers part of the plan.

      •  Korhaka   ( @Korhaka@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        60w is like £120 a year, these costs add up to the point that low spec servers pretty much always cost more in energy than hardware. Of course it also depends on where you live and your energy rates.

        You could buy a 20 year old server that is going to use 800w, or you could buy a mini PC that is probably more powerful and uses like 10-20w.

        Then again, I used to live somewhere that energy was included in the rent so short of starting a bitcoin farm usage wouldn’t really get noticed too much. In that case it would make sense to just go cheap hardware.

        •  HugeNerd   ( @HugeNerd@lemmy.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m glad I don’t have these addictions people seem to have. “I need a computer to measure how much water my toilet uses!” “I need a computer in my refrigerator!” etc

          We’ve passed the useful stage of computing, we are now in the “personal issues” phase.

    • Yes actually still sounds good. Raspberry Pis actually have quite high power draw compared to the performance they give. Like sure the number might be smallish but the performance they give and functionality they have is awful compared to even a mini PC which use similar power. Mini PCs btw are actually one of the best options in performance per watt and can still be cheap, plus they have upgradable RAM and storage. A Mac mini is more expensive but will thrash everything else in efficiency and performance per watt, although non-upgradable. Even slightly older laptops will only draw tens of watts when fully charged, vs a desktop or proper server that could pull 100W even at idle in some cases. Older laptops tended to be more upgradable too.

    • There’s lots of ways to make existing hardware more efficient at the cost of performance. Under-volting the CPU and RAM (or just putting them in “efficiency” mode) can probably save more electricity than you lose in generational improvements. Considering how much more powerful PCs are compared to SBCs, you’d probably still have better performance than an SBC. Also, a more powerful CPU that takes double the power but as a result can idle for more than 50% of the time would be more efficient than a less powerful CPU never idling.

      There’s a lot of other variables (like idle power draw, efficiency at various power levels, idle latency, etc), but in general I think your statement would be inaccurate at least 60% of the time.

    •  MangoCats   ( @MangoCats@feddit.it ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      A good “rule of thumb” to remember: if your electricity rates average (somewhere near) $0.11/kWh you can take the average power draw of a device in watts and that is equal to what it will cost to run that device 24-7 for 365 days.

      So, if that cheap PC draws 50W more than an alternate solution, it’s costing you $50 more per year to use it.

      Some tasks are beyond any RasPi, but it’s well worth evaluating if something like an N100 fanless mini-PC can handle it instead of loading up some Core i7 rig that’s going to cost more to run in the first year than the N100 costs to buy.

    •  Trainguyrom   ( @Trainguyrom@reddthat.com ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Power consumption is a massive reason to really not do that. Its cheap for a reason, its takes a shitload of power to be shit and you will pay more in energy than you save in hardware unless its only powered on for short periods of time

      Ewaste computers actually tend to be on par if not better than an RPi in power consumption these days. It might feel like a RPi should be more efficient given the size and USB power connector, but modern Pis consume a solid 10-20w while in use which is more or similar to most miniPCs (they idle at single digit watts now and can “race to sleep” more effectively than a Pi) while costing about the same and the Pi is far less upgradeable

    •  dil   ( @dil@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      lowendtalk, hella cheap vps with plenty of resources for most self hosted apps, the issue with it is usually storage space but there are ways around that connecting your drives from elsewhere

      •  dil   ( @dil@lemmy.zip ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Warning tho, hella shills too but you could literally make a post asking if certain companies on the site that have active threads are scams and get valid responses that don’t get removed or anything so thats nice, like half of the ones I looked at were giving less resources than they claimed

    • Yeah, my pi sips energy very sparingly. Even an old laptop is going to be drawing more just to power itself, never mind what I run on it.

      That said, pis are a poor value proposition nowadays and there are better options for the same use case

        • Not the person you’re asking but personally I use Jetson nano for some work stuff (and when I upgrade the “old” one is mine), odroid I’ve used for some misc creations and testing, and I’m personally looking forward to trying the radxa x4 as an htpc.

          What I am really excited about right now is tossing my recently acquired spare jetson nano on a drone, right now I’m setting it up to walk around with it and test CV before it gets mounted up on the drone.

        • Not super familiar with the gpio side of things, and I also haven’t dug that deep into the space lately since I already own my rpi and it works for me so take all this with a pinch of salt, but I found some options that seem reasonable

          • Libre Computer Le Potato
          • Orange Pi Zero 2
          • Radxa Zero
          • NanoPi R2S
          • Banana Pi M2 Zero
          •  nivenkos   ( @nivenkos@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s been a while but I remember Orange Pi having terrible support? I haven’t heard of the others.

            Whereas the RPi has the amazing compute module if you need it too.

            Sometimes paying more is better.

            • Oh, for sure. It depends what you need it for. A lot of people just want a pi for something like a pihole or a stats dashboard of some kind (that’s my use case, anyway). You get what you pay for and sometimes you’ve gotta pay for what you wanna get.

  •  JackbyDev   ( @JackbyDev@programming.dev ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    Also, Raspberry Pi first got popular because of the size and cost. Now it’s popular because it’s popular. Not hating on them, I think they’re cool, but they’re not cheap any more. Especially with the scalping.

    Getting x86_64 based systems is going to mean much less headache. Unless you truly truly need the size I wouldn’t consider getting a Pi or other SBC. Just go to literally any used marketplace (Facebook, Craigslist, etc) and get anything.

    •  Patch   ( @Patch@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      but they’re not cheap any more

      People say this, but they really are still cheap.

      The original Raspberry Pi Model B launched for £22 in 2012. The entry level Raspberry Pi 5 is £46, but adjusted for inflation that’s only £32 in 2012 money. So only £10 more expensive in real terms.

      Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is only £14.40, which is only £10 in 2012 money. Compare this to the original Raspberry Pi Model A, which launched for £16.

      People look at the headline cost of the high end RPi 5s (£115 for the 16GB model, £76 for the 8GB), but fail to recognise that there was nothing comparable to these in the Raspberry Pi lineup before, and these are not the only models in the Raspberry Pi lineup now.

      •  MangoCats   ( @MangoCats@feddit.it ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        There was the supply shortage price spike, they really were stupid expensive then if you supported the hoarder/scalpers.

        Since that has cleared… most of the Pi price increases (in inflation adjusted dollars) can be attributed to improved features like more RAM, or people acknowledging that having a good dedicated $20 power supply is preferable to dealing with the flakiness of that old phone charger you found under the bed.

      •  JackbyDev   ( @JackbyDev@programming.dev ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Inflation adjustment doesn’t really tell the whole story though, it’s not like salaries have gone up by the same amount. Regardless, I don’t like dealing with the Zero unless I specifically need something that tiny. It’s just too annoying. Don’t get me wrong! They’re cool! I’m just saying unless I really need a Pi Zero I wouldn’t wanna work with one. I’d rather work with x86_64 than Arm. Like even just getting Java working was really tricky on Zero. Much like a microcontroller has limitations for what you can run on them but they have other benefits, Zeros aren’t really general purpose.

        So yeah, dirt cheap used laptop for general purpose server beats out dirt cheap Pi in my book.

    •  MangoCats   ( @MangoCats@feddit.it ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Pi is popular with me because it’s time efficient. Meaning: when I am trying to get it to do something, it takes less of my time to make the thing actually happen on Pi hardware as compared with most of the other small / embedded alternatives. Notable recent exception: ESPHome on ESP32 hardware, but even there the more limited variation of Raspberry hardware makes it similar to those fruity phones, MP3 players and computers - since there are a limited number of variations, you can usually find information specific to EXACTLY your setup, instead of having to infer from something almost the same, but figure out little wrinkles here and there due to differences between what you are working with and what you are reading about on the internet.

  •  Hyacin (He/Him)   ( @hyacin@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mostly agree, and did the same with my second gen lab build - instead of shiny new NUCs like I had used round 1, I bought old off lease Dell Xeon boxes. SO MANY PROS -

    • Got them up to 14c/28t each
    • They can take GPUs and actually do heavy transcoding/ML work
    • They can take up to like, 128GB of memory, which is GREAT when they’re all hypervisors

    The downsides can’t be denied though -

    • Even without the GPUs and beefed up CPUs, they are power hogs - the CPU alone uses more than an ENTIRE NUC
    • They run HOT
    • They run LOUD

    The same holds true for off-lease SFF stuff, Lenovo and the likes …

    So while reuse/repurpose is absolutely of the utmost importance, no question - when it comes to technology and how quickly it advances and miniaturizes, a thorough and logical pros/cons list is often required.

    I’d add another option though - if you do need what a Pi brings to the table - do you really need a shiny new Pi 5? Is it possible a used Pi 3 or Pi 4 would do the trick, and check the reuse box?

    • The power aspect is a lot bigger of a factor than I would have thought. I had an old computer I was going to use as a server for Foundry that I could keep up all the time, but when I measured its wattage and did the math, it would cost me $20 a month to keep on. A pi costs like $2 to keep running, so it paid for itself pretty quick

    • This is, in my mind, one of the benefits of laptops over micro computers: integrated UPS. Even an old, degraded battery will probably get you a couple of hours with the screen off.

      IME, power consumption is going to be worse overall, for any laptop likely to be in the recycle bin, it’s probably double the consumption of an ARM SBC. The integrated UPS and usually decent power conditioning of the power supply saves you more money with a laptop. Plus, keyboard and screen for emergencies - I just generally expect that, over there life of a micro I’m going to have to drag out and plug in a spare keyboard, mouse, and monitor because something in a device, or an upgrade, or BIOS flash, is preventing a boot.

      There are a lot of good reasons to use laptops instead of SBCs, if you don’t mind the extra power draw and (as she says) don’t have size requirements.

    •  elucubra   ( @elucubra@sopuli.xyz ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Replacement is usually removing 6-10 screws and prying the case with a guitar pick or old credit card. There is most likely a disassembly video on youtube. Batteries from aliexpress or the like are usually cheap (although probably more expensive than the computer). Depending on the application, the “built-in UPS” can be nice.

        • I do SMB support, so I have a pretty good idea of what people tend to do.

          I haven’t seen a PS brick catch fire (possible, OFC, but extremely rare in my opinion) i have seen a PC PSU catch fire, and because of the fan, it’s fucking scsry, like a jet with the afterburner.

          • I would assume that landfill laptop manufacturers are trying to minimize costs even harder on the charger.

            but what timeframe do you mean with “anymore”? laptops made in this decade, or the last 10 years, or something else? there’s plenty of old laptops that fitinto OPs category.

            • Probably for as long as raspberry pis have been around. There have been plenty of scares with phone chargers exploding, and that’s what a raspberry pi is powered from. Laptop chargers haven’t had many issues in the past decade or so.

              • I have heard less about phone chargers failing catastrophically. They also handle much less power (except the fancy ones), and I haven’t seen a hot phone charger adapter yet, but plenty laptop chargers of which some were just very warm, and some so hot just on its outsides that it was uncomfortable to hold it in hand.

                this is why I’m more worried about laptop chargers

      • I had read about it on another thread, which was about using old smartphones as servers (they used Termux).

        Those old lithium batteries, although sometimes seemingly healthy, can catch fire any time. Having them connected to the charger 24/7 is only making matters worse.

        I wouldn’t trust the battery of old devices. I would probably buy a used UPS (without battery) and slap a new battery to it. This would cost more, but it would allow me to also connect other important devices to it - like the router and some lights.

    •  HumanPenguin   ( @HumanPenguin@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not simple to remove. They can all be taken out.

      But the fire risk is a very valid point. All laptops should indicate they should not be left alone when charging. While many do. Setting one up in a unobserved location to run permanently should be batteryless or Lifepo4 adapted. So laptops may not be best suited to this environment. A used thin client or other DC input option may be much easier. Or an old desktop if batts and not wanted.

  •  glitching   ( @glitching@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 months ago

    raspberries were viable while those were cheap. I think I got a 3b (plus?) in pre-deficit years for like $25 second-hand AND I got some shitty case AND a microSD card AND it could run off of a somewhat normal USB phone charger. so using those instead of a 10 year old decommissioned desktop was an awesome value proposition.

    nowadays, those devices are encroaching on trip-digits territory and the power adapter is like $30. the computing power you can buy for a third of that designates raspberries exclusively for niche use cases where footprint and power consumption are primary considerations.

    not to mention fake Jason Statham just rubs me the wrong way, like all them “visionaries”. he makes this sound like he’s the head of Feed Africa or something, on a noble mission to save humanity and whatnot.

  • I would say it can sometimes be nice to have an old Laptop for this purpose, you have to slightly over build your solar but can be nice to have a mouse and keyboard attached and monitor, ssh works. Still have an hp laptop with a core i5 2nd gen sitting out in my greenhouse, is a little more power hungry but not terrible on idle, and is nice to be able to configure changes to watering without going back inside or wrecking the zen by bringing phone.

  •  LeTak   ( @LeTak@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I have an old pentium laptop N3520 with 4GB DDR3. I removed everything and put it in a receiver box 1U size. It consumes so little energy that it can run 5-7 hours from its battery (I call it build in USV). Last time I measured 3-7w. Also passiv cooled , no noise. Another machine I use , is with a i7 4770 with 16GB for Proxmox, 7-20w , peak is much higher but rarely used , only on boot and vm startup.