I appreciate the effort, but it is unrealistic to expect an old tree to straighten.
A better illustration:
Blue shirt keeps doing sus hand gesture in every panel idk if we should let him have any apples
Little dude just trying to reach his apples 🤣
Communism will never exist ,it’s utopia ,it becoming authoritarianism very quickly.We need other real alternatives to what we have now
Marxism is anti-utopian, it’s based on analyzing how societies evolve over time. What is deemed “authoritarianism” is the need for the proletariat to exert its control over the bourgeoisie, rather than the reverse, yet bourgeois rule is more authoritarian.
I recommend you don’t get your information about communism solely from devout anti-communists
I lived in post sovier counties with USSR time ages,so I know pretty well what it was actually.It’s awful and never should happen again,but I didn’t say that I like capitalism too they both authoritarianism in extreme limits
The majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union want it back. Your complaints about socialism don’t make any sense, either.
Sounds like you’re the one who expects utopia
This echoes my concerns every time someone (especially under the age of about 40, especially American) praises “communism” (as if it were one thing) with some kind of absolute adoration.
In this case, OP: how did that justice work for the political dissidents sent to gulags?
The vast majority of people sent to prison by the soviets were criminals, thieves, murderers, rapists, etc. The political prisoners were largely members of the White Army, fascists, monarchists, or were active terrorists against society. For a country that went through a revolution, resistance from the older owning classes is expected, other revolutions were similar in use of force against the monarchy and other ruling classes.
Often repeated, but never much nuance or substance.
Why does the right-wing kid not just come over to the left-wing?
deleted by creator
Why is there a question mark on ‘equality’?
I am assuming that it is because people see “equality” as the epitome of human fairness, so it is questioning that.
Sounds like it’s saying “or maybe this isn’t real equality?”, which is very counter to what I assume is its intended message, an attempt to convince the reader that equality isn’t the epitome of human fairness.
