Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sivecano ( Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

I like gentoo :D

lemmy.ml

message-square
30
link
fedilink
139

I like gentoo :D

lemmy.ml

Sivecano ( Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com )  to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago
message-square
30
link
fedilink

based on https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/blender

  • NotProLemmy ( NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Y

    • Sivecano ( Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s fun

      • NotProLemmy ( NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t you have to build everything from source in gentoo?

        • MyNameIsRichard ( MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nowadays it also has binary packages.

          • grinka ( grinka@lemmy.zip ) Banned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            What the point of using Gentoo with Binary packages?

            • MyNameIsRichard ( MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s for you to decide.

            • zagaberoo ( zagaberoo@beehaw.org ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Still extremely customizable, and peerless rolling release features.

              You can mix and match stable and bleeding edge packages very easily and switch at any time.

              When packages make breaking changes, Gentoo will warn you and guide you through the migration before you update and only if you have the affected package installed.

            • Sivecano ( Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              you still get huge amounts of choice and really good tooling

          • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍 ( sxan@midwest.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That would make a huge difference.

            I ran Gentoo back in the early aughts; it was hella better than Redhat, but it felt like I was constantly compiling stuff, and new installs and upgrades could sometimes take more than a day. I don’t remember what I jumped to after Gentoo, but I’ve never considered it again because of the lack of prehbuilt binaries. It seemed bitcoinish to have thousands of people wasting CPU cycles compiling the same package when it could be compiled once and redistributed.

            Where Gentoo is nice is in the build flags: there’s really no way to get around compiling yourself if you want to exclude optional dependencies, and Gentoo had that in spades. I am just not sure how much that’s actually used anymore, but having binaries gives you the best of both worlds.

            Thanks for posting that; I may have to re-investigate Gentoo.

            • Sivecano ( Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              tbh, with modern CPUs it can be a lot easier. especially if you’re a bit picky about your packages and get a binary package for your browser.

              • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍 ( sxan@midwest.social ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I dunno. I have a fair number of packages installed from AUR, and the Rust ones take forever to compile. CPUs may have gotten faster, but some popular languages have gotten much slower to compile.

                • Sivecano ( Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Packaging rust is terrible, compiling rust is terrible. How can it be this awful? Why is the rust compiler so terrible?

                  • Sivecano ( Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’ve become a rust hater because of this

            • 0x0 ( 0x0@lemmy.zip ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              but having binaries

              For big packages like browsers and office suites, not all packages.
              Still a win if you’re so inclined. I prefer to compile 100%.

              • zagaberoo ( zagaberoo@beehaw.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not so! General binary support was added quite recently.

                • 0x0 ( 0x0@lemmy.zip ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  🤯
                  Well… kinda takes the edge off… i’ll stick to compiling.

Linux@lemmy.ml

linux@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !linux@lemmy.ml

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

  • !opensource@lemmy.ml
  • !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
  • !technology@lemmy.ml
  • !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 261 users / day
  • 1.12K users / week
  • 2.87K users / month
  • 6.25K users / 6 months
  • 1.31K local subscribers
  • 68K subscribers
  • 8.11K Posts
  • 108K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • AgreeableLandscape ( AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml ) 
  • nooter692 ( nooter692@lemmy.ml ) 
  • MarcellusDrum ( MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml ) 
  • Arthur Besse ( cypherpunks@lemmy.ml ) 
  • Cyclohexane ( cyclohexane@lemmy.ml ) 
  • d3Xt3r ( d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code