Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
blackn1ght ( blackn1ght@feddit.uk )  to UK Politics@feddit.uk · 1 year ago

‘There will be an alternative’: Jeremy Corbyn vows to form socialist political party - Politics.co.uk

www.politics.co.uk

external-link
message-square
19
link
fedilink
60
external-link

‘There will be an alternative’: Jeremy Corbyn vows to form socialist political party - Politics.co.uk

www.politics.co.uk

blackn1ght ( blackn1ght@feddit.uk )  to UK Politics@feddit.uk · 1 year ago
message-square
19
link
fedilink
The former Labour leader vowed that there would be an “alternative” in place by the time of the next general election.
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • JohnSmith ( JohnSmith@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    What this country really needs is proportional representation.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ( PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      We had a chance at a version of it, but we blew it.

      I drank the establishment kool aid at the time and voted no on AV

      It’s honestly one of my biggest life regrets

      • Echo Dot ( echodot@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Alternative Vote wasn’t proportional representation though. It’s basically just like having a whole series of head-to-heads under First Past The Post. It didn’t actually solve the fundamental problem which is you end up in a situation where most of the people are unhappy with the result.

        • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ( PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was a step in the right direction. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good

          • Echo Dot ( echodot@feddit.uk ) 
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s like saying that being stabbed is better than being shot.

            The problem was it would have shut down any discussion of any other political change since they would just go “oh we already changed it”.

            • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ( PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              tbh, i think being stabbed probably is better than being shot

  • goatbeard ( goatbeard@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why didn’t he do this ten years ago?

    • ohulancutash ( ohulancutash@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because he alienated all the independent MPs in Parliament in a disastrous anti-May Deal meeting, where he could have stopped an extreme Brexit and toppled the Government, but as soon as the independents entered the room he refused to talk to them and stormed out in a huff.

      So 10 years ago, no-one would want to work with him. He isn’t a consensus politician.

    • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ( PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      10 years ago he was head of one of the largest political parties in parliament. Throwing that away at that point would have been ludicrous

  • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ( PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We need a political party with an exactly two line manifesto

    1. Introduce Proportional Representation
    2. Call another election as soon as PR gets royal assent

    One of the few benefits of Reform if they do get in is they do support PR. Whether that support will dissolve the second they win under FPTP remains to be seen. The Liberals in Canada pulled that particular stunt after decimating the Conservatives there

    • phutatorius ( phutatorius@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Countries with PR aren’t run any better than countries without it.

      The main thing PR does is empower small centrist parties. Intead of two main parties each trying to grab the centre, you end up with two large parties trying to ally themselves with a centre party in order to form a majority.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ( PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has to be better than FPTP

    • Echo Dot ( echodot@feddit.uk ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the few benefits of Reform if they do get in is they do support PR. Whether that support will dissolve the second they win under FPTP remains to be seen.

      Nope. They definitely will not move to a proportional representation system. Why the hell would they?

      Proportional representation benefits them when they are not in power because it’s the only way they can get into power, if they somehow manage to find a way into power under first past the post then introducing proportional representation would only dilute their power.

      In any scenario in which they have power they are unlikely to introduce proportional representation, and in any scenario where they support proportional representation, they won’t have enough power to actually implement it.

      Like most things with Reform, it’s all bark and no trousers.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy ( PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        exactly like the liberals in Canada then, as i said

        • Echo Dot ( echodot@feddit.uk ) 
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except for the liberal bit.

          • oo1 ( oo1@lemmings.world ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            uk lib dems could/should have done it with the coalition. But cameron bribed them with like 5 cabinet seats and they lapped it up.

    • blackn1ght ( blackn1ght@feddit.uk ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. A single issue party tackling electoral reform. Probably something that Reform, the Lib Dems, the SNP, Greens & Plaid could band together and support. I would have zero faith in Reform actually going through with it though if they did gain a majority.

  • blackn1ght ( blackn1ght@feddit.uk ) OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zarah Sultana says she is quitting Labour to start party with Corbyn

  • katy ✨ ( cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    i have no doubts corbyn will be great but i hope that any party started will have an iron clad no transphobia or bigotry line built straight into the charter :(

UK Politics@feddit.uk

uk_politics@feddit.uk

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !uk_politics@feddit.uk

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 33 users / day
  • 269 users / week
  • 520 users / month
  • 1.98K users / 6 months
  • 80 local subscribers
  • 5.74K subscribers
  • 4.44K Posts
  • 15.2K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • tom ( tom@feddit.uk ) 
  • GreatAlbatross ( GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk ) 
  • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc) ( flamingos@feddit.uk ) 
  • frankPodmore ( frankPodmore@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code