If you don’t want to be pestered with the notice box to donate to the tankie dev of Lemmy, you can plop this into uBlock: Origin to block the box from appearing.
lemmy.dbzer0.com
If you don’t want to be pestered with the notice box to donate to the tankie dev of Lemmy, you can plop this into uBlock: Origin to block the box from appearing.
lemmy.dbzer0.com
1… 2… 3… See, in Lemmy the comments are attached under the post. That’s how you know what a person is responding to.
Excellent work!
Line is however subjective. On my device that’s actually 5 lines, because 2 of them wrap. And you didn’t count the blank line between your lines 2 and 3. That would make 4 if you had.
But that’s just coincidence and post hock nitpicking. Really I assumed you were referring to both of my primary comments together, since you also referenced the second. And calling the short paragraphs lines. Count them that way, there were also 4.
Remember me saying you’re arguing semantics? You are now trying to argue that you wrote 4 lines not 3 because of a blank line…
Try nothing. I actually did it! 👨🎓
That is correct. You argued that a blank line counts as part of your original argument… I am playing chess with a pigeon it seems.
“Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the bird is going to knock over the pieces, crap on the board, and strut around like it won.”
You thought this was chess?
With your first reply you played a game of pointless pedantic posturing in the pursuit of pretend points. I just had fun playing along during moments of down time between patients.
No, it wasn’t chess. It was me spanking you logically, pigeon.
Pretending to out position, a pigeon playing at being a person, may be a preposterously puerile peacock, like I’ve never perceived.
You got your cheeks clapped in an argument and now you’re trying to downplay it. 👏 👏 👏