• passepartout ( passepartout@feddit.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    BioShock 1: GOAT

    BioShock 2: also good

    BioShock infinite: great visuals and gameplay, story was meh

    We can extrapolate this further to:

    BioShock 4: literally don’t care.

    What I care about though is Judas, the new game by former BioShock lead developer Ken Levine.

      • passepartout ( passepartout@feddit.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was great potential in the story, I was just underwhelmed by the ending. The setting in the clouds was cool, but honestly not quite comparable to Rapture. It was also pretty short.

        • The ending was one of the most emotional and interesting twists I have ever seen in a video game story. Can you confirm why it was less interesting than Bioshock 1 for example? Because they had extremely similar ending themes.

          • Nutomic ( nutomic@lemmy.ml ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bioshock 1 was an iconic story, first the plane crash, discovering this hidden underwater city, surviving in there and finally returning to the surface. For Bioshock Infinite the ending was totally confusing, something about parallel universes?

    • invertedspear ( invertedspear@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree 1 was GOAT. They nailed weaving the story line in a way that made a railroaded story feel natural. 2 might as well have been a rails shooter, part of the story was literally on a railroad. If that was satire by devs and writers being coerced then bravo, otherwise it was weak. Infinite bright back a lot of what made 1 awesome, mesmerizing even, but the extreme patriotism thing got old real quick. The dimensional jumping storyline was on the cusp of greatness, but would have needed a few more DLC style side adventures to better tell it from other POVs.

      4 is too late and implies more that they have no idea what else to do so back to this well and hope it’s not still dry.

    • Coelacanth ( Coelacanth@feddit.nu ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll play Infinite for the first time this year (maybe… it keeps getting pushed back in my backlog) and I am so curious about it. Some people say it’s one of the best games of all time and some that it’s overrated and meh.

      • overload ( overload@sopuli.xyz ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I played it earlier this year after having played the first 2 only (and that was 10-15 years ago). Infinite is a good game, graphics hold up beautifully. I wouldn’t say it’s one of the greatest of all time but it was a very good game regardless.

        Probably there was a hype cycle at the time of its release that I wasn’t aware of, as that’s the only way I see it as being regarded as meh.

        Honestly it’s just more Bioshock, but set in the clouds rather than underwater, I liked the change of style.

        • NotSteve_ ( NotSteve_@piefed.ca ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I love infinite but my problem with the game is that Booker (the main character/you) is really annoying IMO. I just want him to shut up and be a silent main character rather than some COD protagonist knockoff

    • dankm ( dankm@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you played the remasters? Are they any good? I got about 40% of the way through 1 and ran out of time. Wondering if it’s worth restarting on the original or the new.

      • passepartout ( passepartout@feddit.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have played the remasters of 1 and 2. I believe they are very close to the base game but a little more optimized / polished graphically speaking. So I’d say go for it. 40% is not nothing, but I played the first game 2 or 3 times until now anyway.

  • To put this in comparison, a good half of the entire gaming industry was hyped as shit for Bioshock 2. Game developers have lost every bit of fan faith in their products.

    You know when being told “there’s a new one”, that it’s probably terrible by default.

  • Bioshock 1 was an actual shock. 2, never finished it. Infinite, differently themed shooter with some twists that already had it reaching out to alternative universes but wasn’t so much of a “bio shock”.

    Alternate universes is the modern version of jumping the shark. Starfield did it on its first go, and look at how that ended. Look at Marvel.

    Can’t understand why Bioshock got that much attention and System Shock sort of got ditched for other companies to remaster. Now do SoulShock.

    • Malgas ( Malgas@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t understand why […] System Shock sort of got ditched for other companies to remaster.

      IIRC Ken Levine wanted to make another System Shock game but Irrational couldn’t get the rights.