Correct, liberalism is a center-right ideology. They are literally closer on the political spectrum to fascists than leftists.
Then the fasciast shoots the Marxist and Ancharist, then proceeds to beat the Liberal to death.
Liberal surpised Pickachu face
Cheering the whole time.
Reminds me of Romania right now where the centrist candidate that won the presidential elections (and tons of people on here celebrated because it wasn’t a reactionary right-winger) refused to ban and straight up endorsed legionary and fascist organizations to “fight communism”
Article in Romanian, though using machine translation will get the general idea across
Centrism is always just right wing trying to not get called right wing
Or how happy they were kid starver won them labour immediately just speed up doing what the torries were?
Only if the fascist happens to be in charge right now, because that’s the law. smh.
deleted by creator
Yep, that sums up November 2024 in America pretty well.
Instant sub, now I’ll have some tacticool larpers in my feed LOL
Edit
corrected the autocorrect (it changed “tacticool” to “tactical”)
Something something shoot Toby twice.
Removed by mod
WDYM?
Removed by mod
🤡
Ah right, liberals, the bane of everyone’s existence. Nazis are already blaming liberals for everything, so it was just a matter of time until anarchists (or whatever OP likes to be) start doing the same.
Mooooooooom, call the cops. The lefists are being leftists again, they don’t see that compromising with and providing the material basis for fascists is actually a good thing!!1!1!!1!1!!
Mooom call the cops. Enlightened communist (or whatever you think you are) think everyone is enemy and then they’re surprised when someone doesn’t agree with them.
Wat
if you don’t wanna be blamed for everything, stop helping nazis. it’s not rocket science, you twatwaffle.
I feel like not voting is the single greatest help fascism has ever received.
Not voting for a democrat you mean? I think leftists would vote for a left wing candidate if you Dems can ever bring yourself to nominate one for President. Otherwise it’s just more of the same.
Cornel West ran, non-voters exist because they are happy with either front runner winning. If they wanted neither then they would protest vote.
Most non-voters I know just feel entirely hopeless that any election will lead to improvement. I always vote (and always for a 3rd party), but I’ve stopped giving my non-voting friends a hard time. As one of them said: “I don’t vote for the head of the KKK either!”
They never will if leftists don’t start voting.
deleted by creator
My exact point. NYC, a place that actually has leftists that vote, has now moved left past the DNC. The DNC is the stepping stone to go further left. This is only possible in NYC because of voting.
deleted by creator
Maybe liberals should stop doing things that make fascism grow, and help the people who stop fascism? Maybe that’s asking them to not be racist elitist assholes, so they’ll never do it.
Get ratiod you fascist-sympathizing, state-capitalist, imperialst neo-colonialism enabling ignoramus
Anarchism is a liberal ideology. Why would OP be blaming themselves?
deleted by creator
Tell me you don’t understand politics without telling me you don’t understand politics.
Rule 0: No agitprop. Not a meme, just shittiness.
- Only post socialist memes
That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)
What makes it explicitly humorous?
… it’s literally a telling a joke?
I mean this earnestly, what part is funny?
“X has two bullets” is an established joke format. That the liberal gives the gun to the fascist is ironic in that it subverts the usual formula of someone being shot twice, which is itself based in irony, as one would originally expect two people to be shot. The fact that it’s an accurate metaphor for actual politics is necessary; if it weren’t we’d all think the joke doesn’t make sense.
It’s not funny, though.
It’s just stupid. Top to bottom, left to right. There’s no angle that is funny or enlightened.
The twist is lame. The original premise isn’t funny. Certainly not ‘funnier’ than the propaganda the premise is trying to deliver.
The whole fucking thing is just a Schrödinger’s asshole setup with a different sort of joke than we’re used to with those setups.
If you buy into the agitprop, it reinforces purity testing and infighting, while undermining solidarity between people who could find common ground.
And if you don’t, then it’s just a joke, bro.
deleted by creator
Never specified if the bullets are actually for the firearm in question though…
No surprise that the marxist and anarchist are unarmed.
deleted by creator
I guess the Marxist would keep the gun, but shoot the roof and the anarchist would shoot the roof to name a point?
