Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year ago

Commentary: California is backsliding on climate progress. It's (mostly) Gavin Newsom's fault

www.latimes.com

external-link
message-square
13
link
fedilink
53
external-link

Commentary: California is backsliding on climate progress. It's (mostly) Gavin Newsom's fault

www.latimes.com

silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) M to Climate@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
13
link
fedilink
From rooftop solar to oil drilling, the Golden State governor is failing to live up to his soaring rhetoric.

Archived copies of the article:

  • archive.today
  • web.archive.org
  • ghostarchive.org
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • scintilla ( scintilla@crust.piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m really really hoping people don’t fall for newsom’s bullshit. I feel like 2 weeks ago we were talking about how he sane washes alt right pundits by having them on his podcast and now I swear people forgot about that and are talking about how he should be the next president.

    • Photuris ( Photuris@lemmy.ml ) deleted by creator
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him) ( aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we want real progress, we need to defeat the GOP and then completely dismantle and reform/replace the DNC.

        Why is this ordering necessary?

        This is so ridiculous. I won’t vote for Newsom under any circumstances. I’m so done with the blue no matter who mentality, a mentality which only applies when the candidate is basically a republican. When a progressive/moderate socialist wins the primary, the whole democrat party changes its tune to “well maybe a third party candidate is OK after all”.

        • Someonelol ( Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The ordering is necessary because we’ve had 9 months for some real progressive opposition to coalesce but this is the best we have to use against the orange shit stain. If you’re sick of this then put your money where your mouth is and go campaign for a real progressive or do it yourself and run in some elections. Just saying you’re above voting for blue is the same callous bullshit that got us here in the first place.

          • aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him) ( aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just saying you’re above voting for blue is the same callous bullshit that got us here in the first place.

            Vote blue no matter who is absolutely the dominant strain of thought in the liberal left. If anything is to blame for “getting us here in the first place”, it’s decades of callously putting down people calling for something better.

            • Someonelol ( Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Doing nothing is also screwing us over. Go do something about it if you’ve had your fill with complaining. Canvas for a progressive, run for office yourself, vote blue, or watch the country crumble into fascism. It’s your choice.

              • aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him) ( aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sure, I’ll do all this, and I’ll continue to push back against reactionaries like Newsom. I never said people shouldn’t do anything, I never said I’d do nothing, this is just dodging the question at hand.

      • doingthestuff ( doingthestuff@lemy.lol ) BannedBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        Removed by mod

        • Photuris ( Photuris@lemmy.ml ) deleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • doingthestuff ( doingthestuff@lemy.lol ) BannedBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Removed by mod

            • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮  ( Kolanaki@pawb.social ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m more anti-authoritarian than I am left or right.

              So you’re on the left, but you also don’t understand the political compass. Gotchya.

              • doingthestuff ( doingthestuff@lemy.lol ) BannedBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                Removed by mod

                • GreyEyedGhost ( GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’d like to see examples. For instance, women’s bodily autonomy. Dems say yes, Repubs say no. What’s more authoritarian than saying what you can do with your own body?

                  I’m not saying the Dems aren’t authoritarian- that’s a real problem in America. But more authoritarian than the Repubs? Really?

    • ruuster13 ( ruuster13@lemmy.zip ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hopefully you realize that the only way out of this is by wading through the shit that already surrounds us all.

  • belated_frog_pants ( belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    He’s basically a fucking republican at this point. He hates homeless people and trans people.

    • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a meaningful difference still.

      Ill be looking for a better Democrat during the 2026 Presidential Primary, but that doesn’t mean Newsom is as bad as the Republicans

      • 0_o7 ( 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That meaningful difference is for raising voter base and loyalty to get up the ranks. Once you’re up, lobbying and foreign influence is way more sweeter deal than working on the “interests of the voters”. They’ll be saying what AIPAC writes on the prompter, having Saudis for breakfast and have war crimes on “to-do” list.

        Didn’t you guys fucking learn anything from the last election?

      • belated_frog_pants ( belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org ) 
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If he is against homeless people and trans people he is as bad as GOP. They arent disposable people and its a huge red flag when a candidate treats them like they are.

        They are neighbors and loved ones and are not up for throwing away. Fuck newsome into the same pit as trump

Climate@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !climate@slrpnk.net

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 56 users / day
  • 79 users / week
  • 1.01K users / month
  • 3.43K users / 6 months
  • 172 local subscribers
  • 9.08K subscribers
  • 13.2K Posts
  • 22.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7 ( silence7@slrpnk.net ) 
  • BE: 0.19.21
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code