Beehaw
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
lumpenproletariat ( Deceptichum@quokk.au )  to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago

the welsh are fish

quokk.au

message-square
29
link
fedilink
170

the welsh are fish

quokk.au

lumpenproletariat ( Deceptichum@quokk.au )  to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
29
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • finitebanjo ( finitebanjo@piefed.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • tyler ( tyler@programming.dev ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the even more nuanced answer is that “fish” is not a scientific category so comparing it to mammals makes no sense.

      • Neverclear ( Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Got it , got it… writes in margin

        Ichthyology ≠ Science

        • tyler ( tyler@programming.dev ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fish

          In a break from the long tradition of grouping all fish into a single class (‘‘Pisces’’), modern phylogenetics views fish as a paraphyletic group.

          Paraphyly is a taxonomic term describing a grouping that consists of the grouping’s last common ancestor and some but not all of its descendant lineages. The grouping is said to be paraphyletic with respect to the excluded subgroups. In contrast, a monophyletic grouping (a clade) includes a common ancestor and all of its descendants.

          This is in contrast to the class Mammalia which is a complete clade.

          In other words, I could make up a branch of science called foobarthology that studies Jurassic raptors, whales, and the Rock Dove, but that doesn’t mean those things are related, or a ‘true’ scientific group of their own. It just means I put them together for some other reason, either cause it’s easier for the requirements of the job, or I wanted to, or many other reasons including historical.

          • Neverclear ( Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Scientific group” is not the applicable term. “natural group” or “monophyletic group” or “clade”, would be more… scientific

            • tyler ( tyler@programming.dev ) 
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, and not calling them fish is even more scientific. From a grouping perspective, (which is how you refer to it) there is no such group.

          • F04118F ( F04118F@feddit.nl ) 
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So, fish are paraphyletic to whales?

    • lumpenproletariat ( Deceptichum@quokk.au ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      • finitebanjo ( finitebanjo@piefed.world ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

  • negativenull ( negativenull@piefed.world ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago


    or something, I’m not a biologist

    • skisnow ( skisnow@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Continuing a long proud tradition of “midwit” memes being made exclusively by people who think they’re the 145 IQ guy, but are actually the the 55 IQ guy who found a brown hood.

  • lime! ( lime@feddit.nu ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    they’re a berry i think

    • lumpenproletariat ( Deceptichum@quokk.au ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but only when culinary, this is why it’s okay for vegans to eat whale.

  • azi ( azi@mander.xyz ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Broke: Whales are fish because they look like other fish

    Woke: Whales aren’t fish because they’re in the class Mammalia, not Pisces

    Bespoke: Whales are fish because any monophyletic group that encompasses all the fishes must also include the clade Tetrapoda

    Artichoke: Whales aren’t fish because fishes are a paraphyletic group that includes the entire clade Vertebrata at the exclusion of the clade Tetrapoda.

    Stick and Poke: Whales are fish because they’ve developed the same bodyplan and are in the same ecological niche as the pelagic fishes.

  • StrongHorseWeakNeigh ( StrongHorseWeakNeigh@piefed.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look all I’m saying is Hank Green agrees with me that whales are fish.

    https://youtu.be/-C3lR3pczjo

    • teft ( teft@piefed.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hank Green is great but good god the adhd runs strong in that one. Watch some of his vlogbrothers videos and count the number of cuts. It’s like watching Liam Neeson jump a fence.

      • StrongHorseWeakNeigh ( StrongHorseWeakNeigh@piefed.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe that’s why I like him so much lol

  • TimewornTraveler ( TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    all are fish i dont care

  • BakerBagel ( BakerBagel@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can’t fool me. I’ve read Moby Dick and Melville dedicated an entire chapter about how whales are absolutely fish

  • DragonTypeWyvern ( DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know a doctor of marine biology who disagrees with your assessment.

    Everyone that doesn’t revel in their fishness is a coward or worse, a creationist.

    • stray ( stray@pawb.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know how anyone could read Moby Dick and not come away convinced of their obvious fishness. Surely one’s nature and behavior are more important than one’s reproductive organs.

  • hperrin ( hperrin@lemmy.ca ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cladistically speaking, whales are just a big colony of eukaryotic clones.

    • DragonTypeWyvern ( DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tru

  • Derpenheim ( Derpenheim@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    “BuT thEy aRe iN ThE sAmE tReE oN thE fUnnY ChArT!!!1!!1”

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮  ( Kolanaki@pawb.social ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whales are mammals. How is the dude on the right even being pedantic and not just outright dumb?

    • chaos ( chaos@beehaw.org ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      There isn’t a simple evolutionary definition of “fish”, not the same way there is for, say, mammals. If you found the common ancestor of everything we call a mammal and said “everything descended from this one is also a mammal”, you’d be correct. If you did that for everything we call fish, every animal in the world would be a fish. Also, we decided which animals were fish mostly on vibes, so without a clear definition you can pedantically argue that everything is a fish including mammals.

      • DragonTypeWyvern ( DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not quite true. A lot of worms, for example, wouldn’t be fish, but all fish would be worms. Most invertebrates also wouldn’t be fish.

    • Revan343 ( Revan343@lemmy.ca ) 
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mammals are fish

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮  ( Kolanaki@pawb.social ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that only if they are born between February 19th and March 20th? 🤔

        • jol ( jol@discuss.tchncs.de ) 
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those are fishies.

  • MonkderVierte ( MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Generally not but some fish (Whaleshark) can be confused with a whale.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2 users / day
  • 2 users / week
  • 1.57K users / month
  • 8.17K users / 6 months
  • 288 local subscribers
  • 21.2K subscribers
  • 1.06K Posts
  • 11.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander ( Sal@mander.xyz ) 
  • Track_Shovel ( Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net ) 
  • LadyButterfly she/her ( LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone ) 
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code