• Ilandar ( Ilandar@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      unconventional

      different from what is usual or from the way most people do things

      Is this not a fairly accurate description of her appearance? You might think she’s hot, but it’s objective reality that very tall, strong women are uncommon and generally considered less attractive in modern, Western societies. It’s not even just aboit attractiveness, it’s about whether audiences will find her relatable/believable in certain types of roles when her physique is so unusual…

      • Not the person you replied to, but I take exception with the word “too” in front of unconventional.

        Obviously we know now that she was perfect in the role of Brienne. The main reason (for me, anyway) why film and tv largely suck now is because studios want the “safe” and “conventional” choice for every role. I’m also well over 6 feet tall, I want my tall queens well represented on the screen.

        ETA: tall men don’t seem to have a problem getting roles. The stigma against tall women is just dumb to me.

  • P03 Locke ( p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Neil Newbon was unconventional, so he made it big in voice acting. Owen Wilson broke his nose, threw out convention, and didn’t bother with plastic surgery. Steve Buscemi, Willem Dafoe, John Malkovich, and many others don’t look “conventional”.

    I’m thinking that conventionality is overrated and unnecessary as a casting decision.

    • Ilandar ( Ilandar@lemmy.today ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but there also needs to be the roles available. Villain roles for ugly/creepy men are everywhere and have been throughout history. Roles for tall, strong women have generally been very rare.